Fun's fun, guys. Kill yer posts, and let it ride...
Printable View
Fun's fun, guys. Kill yer posts, and let it ride...
For all of you guys and gals looking in and thinking of joining up here... you can see for yourself how dull the fucktards of this site are. They all now think I'm chavis... fucking knobs.
Somebody said you were possibly Geezer. That might fit. However, if you were, you would be rebanned instantly. I also think chalice would have spotted you and expressed his disdain for you. :idunno:Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah
I can't explain how happy it makes me to let you all know that I am me... I'm not now, nor have I ever been anyone else... all rumours to the contrary are the work of chavis who is just trying to steal the credit due for my sparking repetoire, and cutting wit... jealousy is a damnedable sin.
Prove yer wit, then. We have yet to experience this great feature of yours. :mellow:Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah
Now I know from your previous posting that your grasp of the english language is fuzzy at best RejectOfAllah, what with the spotty (read poor) spelling and sentences missing words/sections in your frenzy to deliver the latest brain fart, but what on earth is a ' fasco-christer ' ?Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllahI'm going to tell Allah(swb) on you... he'll make you pay... you fasco-christer, you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hologram
Is this some new kind of mong word (or rather compound word in this case ) in your own private language ?
Fuck off you mong, I'm not a performing circus act who's here for your personal entertainment.Quote:
Originally Posted by megabyteme
That should be "what's with", "words and/or sections", and you shouldn't ask a question that ends as a statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
4/10 for effort, 2/10 for attainment.
It's in my dictionary... just a few pages from pennative. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ArtemisNow I know from your previous posting that your grasp of the english language is fuzzy at best RejectOfAllah, what with the spotty (read poor) spelling and sentences missing words/sections in your frenzy to deliver the latest brain fart, but what on earth is a ' fasco-christer ' ?Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah
Is this some new kind of mong word (or rather compound word in this case ) in your own private language ?
@reject: So, dancing like a monkey is the way you would show your wit, if you felt like performing, then. I can see how you would go with that.
What, now you are qualified to work on sentences, like you do Interwebs stuff? Let me guess... you've got a Level IV Certification, right? Tell us some complexities in the "server side", and "client side" of the conversation. Is this "languagesharing", then?Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllahThat should be "what's with", "words and/or sections", and you shouldn't ask a question that ends as a statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
4/10 for effort, 2/10 for attainment.
You've yet to explain the brandnew mong word ?Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllahThat should be "what's with", "words and/or sections", and you shouldn't ask a question that ends as a statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
4/10 for effort, 2/10 for attainment.
Or do you justify our own illiteracy by simply ignoring it ?
and 'what with' the spotty....spelling is the correct wording 'what's with' makes no sense in that context, unless it is to you ? I think you need to toddle off and reread the post as the question was the end of the sentence, the question being what on earth is fasco-christer ?
How exactly does 'what on earth is fasco-christer?' qualify as a statement ?
Then get back to me about your neato new word salad.
It makes sense, have you never used the turn of phrase, "what with", before? However, the shortening of mongoloid that you U.K. (assumed) minions partake in feels quite awkward. It's too close to mang, so it doesn't carry the same connotation to my ears. Why does mongoloid own that abbreviated form anyway? Why not mongrel or Mongolian. Too much room for error, I'm not sure what you all are calling each other anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllahThat should be "what's with", "words and/or sections", and you shouldn't ask a question that ends as a statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
4/10 for effort, 2/10 for attainment.
Yes, yes, it refers to Mongolian. Those bastards, and their land conquering ways... :angry:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
:lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by megabyteme
I'm very, very far away from the U.K. hence the odd posting times in fact you can't get much further away at G.M.T. +12 but the shortening of 'mong' is from mongoloid as in Trisomy 21 not Mongolian ( I hear they are nice friendly people ). The term was meant as mong as in idiot word, sorry for the leeway in interpretation that gave you.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyIt makes sense, have you never used the turn of phrase, "what with", before? However, the shortening of mongoloid that you U.K. (assumed) minions partake in feels quite awkward. It's too close to mang, so it doesn't carry the same connotation to my ears. Why does mongoloid own that abbreviated form anyway? Why not mongrel or Mongolian. Too much room for error, I'm not sure what you all are calling each other anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah
Mongrel doesn't really have the same zing although it does fit in a way I suppose....
Thank fuck for that...Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
We'll all believe you, after all, you would know.
Ah yes, more shining wit*Quote:
Originally Posted by rejectOfAllahThank fuck for that...Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
We'll all believe you, after all, you would know.
(* a spoonerism)
Now back to the word salad, You do realise that word salad is a symptom of amongst other things Schizophrenia, Shizophasia, Logorrhea and last but not least dementia.
I would really get that checked out.
No I'm serious, the cheese could be slipping off your cracker as we speak!
Given the choices you've presented me with, I'll take schizophrenia, thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
For $200 Alex
I didn't take you as a cheap question kinda guy, macky. :mellow:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
It's been different ever since Watson decided that even though Watson understands KY Jelly, Watson isn't going to use KY Jelly.Quote:
Originally Posted by megabytemeI didn't take you as a cheap question kinda guy, macky. :mellow:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
So Watson is a roughrider then ?Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyIt's been different ever since Watson decided that even though Watson understands KY Jelly, Watson isn't going to use KY Jelly.Quote:
Originally Posted by megabyteme
The roughestQuote:
Originally Posted by ArtemisSo Watson is a roughrider then ?Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky