I thought we'd already started doing that earlier this week over at the moderation. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Printable View
I thought we'd already started doing that earlier this week over at the moderation. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
I will probably get put on moderation for advertising. But in case the forum is forced to meet this blackmailers demands there is a small corner shop near me who is selling lollipops, buy on get one free, all next week. :rolleyes:
:lol: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by SnnY
I'd completely forgotten about teh pseudo-geppers with all the excitement.
Half an hour and still no action.
His clients must be aliens, you know what interstellar communication is like these days.
We have consulted our client and have agreed a conclusion. We have given our client the tools we have for the exploits as you have not co-operated. Icebast will act no longer in either parties interests due to the client's vagueness in the cause and action of the offending action.
ICEBAST hold no more action in this dispute. (Code:C)
Closing statement wished to be made by client:
This is not my intention just sharing not to take this board down. *lol* We could have stayed together forever but not hurting like this.The old light blue is gone and I am going to hurt everything else. I have a lots of tools here and you are opened.
your client is internet.news :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: http://www.sighost.us/members/danb/glag.gif
Has anyone seen my sig at t'Moderation recently. I swear it's been like that for weeks :unsure:
Hi David http://filelist.org/pic/smilies/wave.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by ICEBAST
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICEBAST
get ready the aliens are comming :D
Yeah, haha.
We have his name, and someone can prolly get his adress as well.
EDit: It might possibly be sharedholder or musle I guess, tho'.
No it isn't :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by SnnY
And yep,it's definitely I.N.
Two words that give it away: sharing and *lol*
I nearly asked if anyone had seen a nutter running around loose.
Just needed to put 2+2 together. :01:
sharing could be a coincidence, but the *lol* and the opened makes it a bit hard to dismiss, upon further consideration.Quote:
Originally Posted by Filliz
So it has to be IN or someone doing an impression. :lol:
And the fact that neither of them(shared' & musle') would be so daft as to think things could be sorted through blackmail I guess.
And we do have a name and pictures of him, so giving the cops something to go on shouldn't be that hard.
And for that reason alone it would be pretty strange if it really was him.
No its not {I}{K}{E}. :ph34r:Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
:huh:Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboab
Nuts :frusty:Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboab
Seems like everyone forgot teh bannage. :blushing:
no, didn't forget, just wanted to see what bullshit he said next :D
thanks though Lynx, I was growing tired of having to keep changing his avatar back :blushing:
I think the one I picked out suits him better :lol:
Ohh, ohhh. A fun thread in Everything Related, how rare! :w00t:
Thanks Manker. I hate having to explain them. :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Btw at filliz: I wasn't trying to accuse your wee buddies, I was merely trying to think of someone who might have the means to hire this particular individual, and who'd have a grudge at the same time.
I don't think shared or musle would try to imitate IN tho'.
:lol: Internet.News.
I never said you were accusing them.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnnY
I just stated that I'm pretty sure they're not behind this.
I guess that rolleyes smiley gave the wrong impression.
Good good, but I don't think it's IN either, he's pretty deliberate with those words, I don't think he'd use them like that.
Damn some people have too much spare time on their hands...
this rules.
fucking subscribed
edit: fuck, I was too late for the fun :dry:
:crying:
Damn, I was sure it was that Withcheese guy. :snarl:
Edit: btw I have also hacked the board and I demand DanB's post count be reset, manker be put on a wordfilter that makes him speel rong and the female members be made to use pictures of their cleavages as avatars.
bah the whole thing is a joke why are you all replying thats what the guy wants hes just laughing at us all
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICEBAST
It was a nice try but you should have stuck to just one or two of IN's trademark utterances. Instead you went for at least seven (that I can spot) in the space of two sentences.
He was the easiest ex-member to emulate in your mind, just throw in a few "netty-isms" and you're done. Sadly you failed, the quote was too Netty to be Netty.
You should have gone with someone like BD. Just post too many smilies, rant against J'Pol and say "I really got to you."
The spellings to good for netty. :lol:
:01:
Im gonna read this later :lol:
internet news suck bawls :)
:lol:Quote:
and the other runs a fairly dead forum with about 12 regular members. I can see why they would love to be allowed back on a much more popular forum, in spite of the fact that they claim otherwise.
For what my opinion is worth, I don't believe it was Billy Dean.
I do think it could be David. He can't help but post nettyisms. He started lots of accounts at our forum, mostly pretending to be a member from here and aimed at discrediting other members from here and it was always obvious from the first post who it was. He is easy to imitate though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AussieSheila
So you don't think that my ban from R&C is not related to the appearance of Icebast?
No not moderated, banned.
Why banned? I didn't break a single rule.
Internet news could not crack a nut, much less a forum and the portrayal here is a pathetic caricature.
Rikk admitted that he would do this if he could, who's to say he can't or found someone who could.
Why do you think he is not responsible?
Rikk is looking more and more likely, too me.
Somebody is getting pretty scared and wants to shut me up, but only until 2007.
I can't even e-mail you, it is blocked.
Hey I miss all the fun . Too fucking lazy to read the whole thing ,but don't think its the kltechsupport crew they have way to much class for that ! :)
Feel free to update me ! ;)
You don't have to, it's his board. Possibly if someone came onto my board and said the things you said I would be tempted to ban them too.Quote:
Originally Posted by hobbes
I gave David more chances than anyone I think. I talked him back onto the forum a few times. He blew it everytime. He really is that thick or deranged or something. It is just the sort of thing he would do. (Hire internet thugs) I don't believe he could do it himself, he was locked out of his own forum quite easily.Quote:
Internet news could not crack a nut, much less a forum and the portrayal here is a pathetic caricature.
I have found absolutely nothing to suggest he's had anything to do with it and I am looking. I honestly don't think he did, he isn't quite as evil as you think, but nothing is impossible. I don't really know any of you. If I find anything that says he has I'm sure you will hear about it.Quote:
Rikk admitted that he would do this if he could, who's to say he can't or found someone who could.
Why do you think he is not responsible?
Rikk is looking more and more likely, too me.
Somebody is getting pretty scared and wants to shut me up, but only until 2007.
That's not true. You emailed me yesterday at an address that has nothing to do with the Club.Quote:
I can't even e-mail you, it is blocked.
Andie,Quote:
Originally Posted by AussieSheila
The things I said were a response to his 3 consecutive posts blaming me and his vicious pm to be sure I knew about the thread. I didn't come to his board to accuse, I was invited, do you want the PM?
Why would you blame me?
You are the one who told him that I suspected him, and he spit the dummy.
You make it sound like my post came out of the blue. Oh, no. He requested
it.
Why do you think he didn't do it, when he very specifically said he would, if he could?
You don't think he tells the truth, do you?
He banned me because he is a coward and is afraid of the logic I provide for the confused.
When I attempted to e-mail you. I got an error message, why would I lie about that?
Hope that does not become a requirement in criminality. It would mean millions of suspects for every crime. :lol: :lol:Quote:
Have you found anything to suggest he didn't