Printable View
Anyone who pays any attention to my posts knows that I was a big supporter of Jackson. I still think he's innocent, but if he is found guilty I think I will accept it, and that will be a dark day. He's done so much for children and it'll be really sad if he's been doing just as much to children.
we will very soon find out
ATM he is still innocent. You see it all the time in the movies: Innocent until proven guilty.
In some countries of the world it's not just the movies, it's also the case with the judicial system.Quote:
Originally Posted by yonki
Yup, there must be at least one or two where the presumption of innocence is still there.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Some countries even take it seriously, but not many.
Last year I said I had no idea. After a year of much media coverage I am just as baffled.
As SGG pointed out, if he reads Hustler then he can't be "innocent" (ah the literal mindedness of the autistic :) ). However, it is hard to tell if he is guilty as charged (this time) as the accusers are as weird as he is. Whereas I was a tad surprised when OJ walked, I don't think any verdict can be ruled in or out on this one.
To be entirely honest, that's my kind of thinking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
Not re the subject at hand, there is no doubt in my mind that he is (currently) innocent. As he has yet to be proven guilty.
Just the thinking in general. See outside of the proverbial box. Said box being a construct of "common sense", pre-conceptions and prejudices, in the proper sense of the word.
hmmm.....
jury says yesh public says noez
i dont like the guy but i dont think he did it....