Quote:
Originally posted by Night Ass@7 September 2003 - 08:43
Hey I am 17
if he is 16 i think it is all right for him to be looking a porn of gals one yr unger but no more then 1 yr.
it seem to me we have a simerler problum about porn but in my cace i dont find gals under 22 to be attractive.
now if he looks at below one yr unger them him self eg 14,13 then he has a porblum and shood seek help but ignoring all his posts and trying to get him to leve is not nice. (just like how gays use to be treated)
and as far as i know all of his past posts have been fine.
So long as he is not trying to post kiddy porn pics on this forum i dont see whats the problum.
now who fond thees pics that he was sharing who was searching for RAPE,14yr gals and so forth.
now in aus the age of consent is 16
now dus that meen if a guy and a gal was going out & having S^X her being 15 and 11 months and him being 15 and 1 month wen she terned 16 wood thay have to stop having S^X for 10 mouths?
Now u know drugos how thay need drugs
i am shor peterfiles r like that so u shoodent treat them bad just the dealers of the kiddy porn
now imajon you thort 23 yr old gals where hot and then one day u where told 23 yrs gals was to yong and then all thes ppl called u a peterfile and wonted to kick you out of the forum and ppl sed u ofended them just being in the same forum and u cant help what u fine attractive
just like gays will be gays and peterfiles will be peterfiles
i am not say Gays r like peterfile by the way
when would anyone say 23 is too young?? it is perfectly acceptable for older men/women to have younger girl/boyfirends as long as they are OVER the age of consent - Hugh Hefner, Demi Moore and Peter Stringfellow to name a few.