Can someone explain how 9/11 deniers damage america?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brotherdoobie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley

Warmonger.

---

It's just Kevin.

-bd

---

MaxOverlord does not = Kevin. If thats what you were implying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxOverlord

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brotherdoobie

It's just Kevin.

-bd

---

MaxOverlord does not = Kevin. If thats what you were implying.

---

No,I believe thats what you inferred,Max.


-bd

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brotherdoobie

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxOverlord

MaxOverlord does not = Kevin. If thats what you were implying.

---

No,I believe thats what you inferred,Max.


-bd

---

I am clueless to what your talking about. Never said anything remotely close to me being kevin..whoever that is.

j2k4 = Kevin. I wasn't implying you were him. (just politcally,similar.) :dabs:


Peace,Paul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vidcc

AQ are going to come after us if we are in Iraq or not.

---

But Rosie O'Donnell says terrorists are just like us; that they're not to be feared.

Now I'm confused. :dry:
































I think it's a question of where this occurs, actually, and haven't we said "better there than here" at all (at all).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vidcc

AQ are going to come after us if we are in Iraq or not.

---

But Rosie O'Donnell says terrorists are just like us; that they're not to be feared.

Now I'm confused. :dry:

---

What has that got to do with anything?

But think about it. We all start off the same. What changes the way we act ? Do other view us the way we view ourselves. Do we view others the way they view themselves.

A lot of the problems in the world are because we take a one dimensional viewpoint. We don't try to understand them and they don't try to understand us. It then become a question of who is going to "have it up to here" first.


Interesting though that Bush has "lowered the bar" now to define success in the same way that they condemned kerry for.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

I think it's a question of where this occurs, actually, and haven't we said "better there than here" at all (at all).

---

Oh in that case Clinton was a success, because after the first bombing at wtc we had no other attacks here while he was in office..... just the ones "over there".

Success is defined as raising terror attacks worldwide (American targets included) as long as we haven't been attacked (YET) in downtown USA. Great foreign policy. The world will love it and as families bury their loved ones the cries of "thank goodness the Americans weren't hurt" will fill the air and we our popularity will soar :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brotherdoobie

j2k4 = Kevin. I wasn't implying you were him. (just politcally,similar.) :dabs:


Peace,Paul

---

Geez. Now I'm wondering if I am Kevin.:huh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thewizeard

We need a leader that will talk to them in their language.

---

I think that's exactly what they got.

In other news, if you have a group of people who hate everyone who isn't one of them.

If they declare that you have two options, join them or die.

Talking about it isn't one of my top options.

---

I did say talk in their own language.

Talking you may take literally or metaphorically..I am referring to the metaphorical option.

If we wish to survive, we have no other option.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vidcc

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

But Rosie O'Donnell says terrorists are just like us; that they're not to be feared.

Now I'm confused. :dry:

---

What has that got to do with anything?

But think about it. We all start off the same. What changes the way we act ? Do other view us the way we view ourselves. Do we view others the way they view themselves.

A lot of the problems in the world are because we take a one dimensional viewpoint. We don't try to understand them and they don't try to understand us. It then become a question of who is going to "have it up to here" first.

---

We most certainly do not start out "the same".

This bit about us understanding them and them understanding us is just blather, and if you ask them, they'll tell you the same thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

I think it's a question of where this occurs, actually, and haven't we said "better there than here" at all (at all).

---

Oh in that case Clinton was a success, because after the first bombing at wtc we had no other attacks here while he was in office..... [/QUOTE]

No other attacks under Clinton?

News to me...:huh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

We most certainly do not start out "the same".

This bit about us understanding them and them understanding us is just blather, and if you ask them, they'll tell you the same thing.

---

How do we not start out the same? Are they somehow born fully grown with a view?

And if you are going to call the rest "blather" explain why. Otherwise the comment is pointless.

I suggest that any attempt to understand is usually just a way to find something we can use to further our agenda, and vice versa

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

No other attacks under Clinton?

News to me...:huh:

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4
I think it's a question of where this occurs, actually, and haven't we said "better there than here" at all (at all).

---

Your insinuation here is that it doesn't matter if the attacks are elsewhere. Well we weren't attacked again on the mainland while clinton was in office.

Now I could point out several domestic terrorist incidents but you made it clear earlier that it has to be AQ to count