Printable View
Still reeling over your humiliations these past weeks Kev?Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
If you didn't have such an over inflated ego these setbacks wouldn't have hit you so hard.
You've built up a persona on here of someone who resorts to ridicule and personal attacks against anyone who opposes your right wing, Fox News, views.
If you hadn't been so cocky, and taken the time to check your sources, you wouldn't be in this position now. :)
to be fair, you laughing with yourself and associating JP to crimes committed by people who happen to share some theological beliefs with him is more predictable :mellow:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ava EstelleStill reeling over your humiliations these past weeks Kev?Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
If you didn't have such an over inflated ego these setbacks wouldn't have hit you so hard.
You've built up a persona on here of someone who resorts to ridicule and personal attacks against anyone who opposes your right wing, Fox News, views.
If you hadn't been so cocky, and taken the time to check your sources, you wouldn't be in this position now. :)
You miss the point. I Googled for an article I read some time ago, I found it on a site belonging to someone I never heard of. JP then decides this person is a racist. The article has nothing to do with the person who runs the site, it was just reproduced there. Had I looked around I could have found it on a dozen other sites, including The Guardian.Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
JP then claimed that I be held to account for the views expressed by the owner of the site I lifted the article from, and that I was responsible for this person's views. I merely pointed out the hypocrisy of this, and parralled it with the views and actions of the catholic church, an organisation with a centuries old tradition of the most heinous crimes imaginable. If, as he contends, I have any responsibility for the views of that person, then he does also with regards to the Vatican ... he can't have it both ways.
i didn't miss the point, i understood all that. i was just saying that you're predictable :dabs:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ava EstelleYou miss the point. I Googled for an article I read some time ago, I found it on a site belonging to someone I never heard of. JP then decides this person is a racist. The article has nothing to do with the person who runs the site, it was just reproduced there. Had I looked around I could have found it on a dozen other sites, including The Guardian.Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
JP then claimed that I be held to account for the views expressed by the owner of the site I lifted the article from, and that I was responsible for this person's views. I merely pointed out the hypocrisy of this, and parralled it with the views and actions of the catholic church, an organisation with a centuries old tradition of the most heinous crimes imaginable. If, as he contends, I have any responsibility for the views of that person, then he does also with regards to the Vatican ... he can't have it both ways.
Nonsense, I described your source as questionable. I didn't decide he was a racist, the fact that he was a prominent KKK member decided that. He's also an anti-semite, I didn't decide that either, he did.
I also didn't claim you were responsible for his views. You're just talking bunkum now.
Oh and the quote is a direct quote, lifted from the forum. Not by me by someone else. Read by others at the time.
Denying it any more just makes you look even more pathetic.Quote:
I'd just love to see Israel destroyed, maybe their god will come back and do to them what he has done many times in their history. Israel is a modern day Sodom and Gomorrah. The Nazis certainly taught them well, there's nothing like a practical demonstration to get the message across. l dread to think what the place would be like today if six million of them weren't killed, they'd be waging war across the whole Middle East.
Is that good or bad? :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
For weather patterns - good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ava EstelleIs that good or bad? :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
For horse races - bad.
in this case it's bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ava EstelleIs that good or bad? :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
you always resort to the catholic-peadophile thing. now you're saying it's to point out the hypocrisy of JP pointing out using david duke as a source (or middleman as it seems).
you also claim to have never heard of him, which means that this is the first time which means the last 500 times weren't to point anything out
That's your interpretation ... I've taken years of shit from JP, and I reserve the right to give as good as I get, and if that means hitting a nerve, that's what I'll do ... he knows how to stop it, but he has no desire to do so, because he's a vindictive twat.Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
I have no idea what that means, but the 500 is a clue that you're talking bollox. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
What shit, what was it you said "put up or shut up". I proved your anti-semitism, using your own words. What shit have you put up with from me exactly. You've said this a lot now but I don't actually know what you mean.
Oh and it doesn't hit a nerve, other than you being allowed to do it so frequently, that kind of surprises me.
I know that there have and continue to be priests who are paedophiles. It makes big news. The same goes for scout leaders or youth leaders or pretty much any group of people.
Like I said I also find the Catholic Churches record on the subject appaling and those who protect the paedophiles should be prosecuted for it as well. However that is the vast minority. In the same way as it is for all of the other organisations. It's just that 99.9999% of Policemen not being paedophiles is hardly big news. 1 being caught is, his force closing ranks or moving him, bigger still.