Chalkmongoose is a 16 year old Alchy
Printable View
Chalkmongoose is a 16 year old Alchy
Very well thought out post, very coherently put together.
I can not blame you for your feelings and applaude the manner in which you express yourself! :D
Hey come on guys......The boy made a mistake.....he has heard it all.......let it go :)
Jonno B)
Jonno i will take your advice, iam just walking away
This whole topic is a farce, filled with lies and excuses. It was videos, not pictures that were shared, and they were of the worst kind, and there were at least 120. although the content can't be verified, it's unlikely someone would rename that many files with the sort of filename that was present. We aren't even talking about files purporting to be of 16 year olds, even 14 year olds as it was suggested. A lot were supposedly much younger.
If it was an 'experiment', why did it take him well over a hundred videos to come to the conclusion "The experiment failed, the content found was revolting in its nature"
I wouldn't have commented if it wasn't for the lies that have been put forward as an explanation.
Quote:
This whole topic is a farce, filled with lies and excuses. It was videos, not pictures that were shared, and they were of the worst kind, and there were at least 120. although the content can't be verified, it's unlikely someone would rename that many files with the sort of filename that was present. We aren't even talking about files purporting to be of 16 year olds, even 14 year olds as it was suggested. A lot were supposedly much younger.
If it was an 'experiment', why did it take him well over a hundred videos to come to the conclusion "The experiment failed, the content found was revolting in its nature"
I wouldn't have commented if it wasn't for the lies that have been put forward as an explanation.
U c this kind of information that it always left out..
Is this true?Quote:
Originally posted by the_faceman@21 August 2003 - 19:15
This whole topic is a farce, filled with lies and excuses. It was videos, not pictures that were shared, and they were of the worst kind, and there were at least 120. although the content can't be verified, it's unlikely someone would rename that many files with the sort of filename that was present. We aren't even talking about files purporting to be of 16 year olds, even 14 year olds as it was suggested. A lot were supposedly much younger.
Well now who's story are we supposed to believe?
agreedQuote:
Well now who's story are we supposed to believe?
If this person is the age that he says he is, which like JP I disbelieve. Is he trying to get absolution from his 'peers'? Does he think that this would absolve him from all the legal and moral implications. What would happen if this person went to a priest and told him the same story in the course of a confession? I honestly dont know, could someone enlighten me.