Quote:
Originally posted by the_faceman@21 August 2003 - 20:15
This whole topic is a farce, filled with lies and excuses. It was videos, not pictures that were shared, and they were of the worst kind, and there were at least 120. although the content can't be verified, it's unlikely someone would rename that many files with the sort of filename that was present. We aren't even talking about files purporting to be of 16 year olds, even 14 year olds as it was suggested. A lot were supposedly much younger.
If it was an 'experiment', why did it take him well over a hundred videos to come to the conclusion "The experiment failed, the content found was revolting in its nature"
I wouldn't have commented if it wasn't for the lies that have been put forward as an explanation.
Thank you for the perspective, from someone who actually saw the files names.