The UK has now cleared it's debt, in relation to WWII, owed to the USA and Canada.
It's not too bad, we only had to pay back twice the original amount. Very favourable interest rates.
Printable View
The UK has now cleared it's debt, in relation to WWII, owed to the USA and Canada.
It's not too bad, we only had to pay back twice the original amount. Very favourable interest rates.
We didn't HAVE to pay most of it back, we chose to, unlike the Australians, who still haven't coughed up for the Sydney Harbour Bridge!
does this mean the dollar is even weaker?
Maybe we will learn from this fine example set for us.
Russia has paid all its debt to he IMF due to it shuge oil income
The First World War cost Britain most of its overseas reserves it had to sell most of its assets to pay for the war ! Its been broke ever since !
regards
Digby
Does that mean we can afford to have another world war now? :blink:
Interest free credit, or hire-purchase pay nothing until 2051? :unsure:
No it was the First World War.
Britain had to sell most of its foreign assets (eg most of the railways of South America) to pay for the First World War buying materials and subsiding many of the Allied participants.
See Winston Churchill's book - I think it was called The World Crisis where he lists two pages of figures on this subject. I've lost my copy.
Kind Regards
Digby
NZ
And that would be you, would it?
The United States demanded that in return for Lend Lease, which Britain desperately needed to sustain its war effort, Britain pledge itself to abandon any aspirations of post-war empire, dismantle the system of imperial preference and shrink the sterling area to prevent it from competing with the dollar.
We know how you love to jump in on a whiff of triumphalism j2, but you really should try reading before commenting, I suggest John Maynard Keynes: Fighting for Britain, 1937-1946.
The price Britain paid for US financial support was the dismantling of the British Empire.
In this case?
Yes, I believe that would be me.
Well, that could be your characterization of the arrangement, but I would read it differently, as well you know.
The fact is, whether your version is true/accurate/radically misleading/just dumb does not adequately inform the events which followed.
What we do know, and what is generally accepted as true, is that aid was asked for/offered to the British advantage, She was therefore able to successfully conclude the Second World War, but, to the eternal regret of some, ceased to rule much beyond Her native Isles.
Whatever the eventuality, it seems clear that, if the U.S. did indeed demand forfeiture of Her empire, Britain saw a workable play, and accepted.
I honor those who decided to survive, and win the war by doing so.
WTF, triumphalism?
I didn't start this thread, you know, and besides which:
Did Keynes buy it?
Or did he shy from judgement?
I mean, really now...do you want to argue about it?
We could argue about who fucked up Iraq first and worst, if you like...
So sorry for not replying sooner; my 40 lb. puppy punched me in the eye Sunday evening, and I didn't read your post until just now.