You can view the page at http://filesharingtalk.com/content/1...ex-Study-Finds
Printable View
You can view the page at http://filesharingtalk.com/content/1...ex-Study-Finds
Makes sense
It's not by a gaping margin. It's more alarming that only 1/3 of women are having sex at least once a week. Come on men, get out there, put in your hours, sex these women.
I hated statistics at school and I can't remember how to calculate statistical significance but my gut feeling is that those results are so close as to be inconclusive. But everyone should have more sex (except kids and corpses). :D
Of course, these gamer women still won't have sex with geeky, loser gaming males. :noes:
...they seem to be having sex with me. maybe you're playing the wrong games? :yup:Quote:
Originally Posted by megabyteme
:D Actually, I was referring to the subsection of gamers that would fall into "geeky, losers". I didn't mean to imply all gamers. I'm not a gamer at all.
I think he means he don't discriminateQuote:
Originally Posted by mr. nails
Attachment 93553
I think this is more of a correlation than a causal relation.Mosty probably, gaming women are younger on average than non-gaming women. Even if the study counted women up to a certain age (say 50), still I think that women in age group 18-25 are more likely to be a gamer than women in age group 40-50.And women in age group 18-25 are also having sex more often than women between 40-50.So it is only logical to find this relation. It doesn't mean that gaming itself causes more sex.
You're absolutely right. Another point to consider: More boys than girlsare gaming, and boys are gaming more time. The chance of getting fixed on by your boyfriend is rather high.
That means: Should you have one - and what else could you do with a boyfriend?
Uh oh, critical thinker coming through. Now, can you manage to make a point yet seem like you're spamming at the same time? It's how you reach the next level.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinges