We Can Improve And Use Imesh

Printable View

12-09-2003, 02:08 AM
sharedholder

If Sharman block K-Lite we can improve and use Clean iMesh use the same network Fastrack , don't contain spyware because is already cleaned , never crashed on my pc, support sig2dat links, avipreview , speed up , and is looking better then kazaa.I will try resouce hacker on this to see how is looking inside ,if anyone want to help or have ideeas is welcome.

http://server4.uploadit.org/files2/0...esh_search.gif

Here is another team that cleaned Imesh and added some feautures and tools ( but i don't trust, i like the DrDamn Version)

Note: jamar's Version is not totally clean, you must run ad-aware .Try to do something using Resource Hacker or anythign else you know with DrDamn cversion .The Imesh Light claims to have:
Peer Guardian
AVI Preview
Speed-Up Sharemonkey
Sig2Dat

But i readed some negative reviews on it , so try to do something with DrDamn version.
12-09-2003, 02:32 AM
camille

Imesh by Dr. Damn is reliable, I've tried it but it's far behind when it comes to Klite. They've only few users.
12-09-2003, 02:34 AM
sharedholder

P2P Networks
December 7, 2003 - 12:00 EST
FastTrack
iMesh 1,311,015 source--------- Slyck
12-09-2003, 02:44 AM
camille

Nice research, Shared.
12-09-2003, 03:15 AM
RealitY

I thought that the iMesh Clean was based on a version Fast Track that is before the newer KMD versions, thus if KL++ gets kicked off the network they may as well.

I have noticed in recent searches that there seem to be alot of KL++ users, this may be due to the lack of conectivity of regular KMD users. I have also noticed that @fileshare users show up as well, iMesh users. However if we were to merge together considering iMesh is not updated then there may be a decent amount of numbers between us...
12-09-2003, 04:10 AM
camille

Merging two P2P programs can be a vast for users. It's easily updated if both founder will corroborate.
12-09-2003, 05:58 AM
rafi_d

A story on KL++ extermination :

http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=339

???????????????? True ot not true ?????????????????
12-09-2003, 07:54 AM
sharedholder

No we don't have to merge the 2 programsj ust improve imesh like is done it in the past with K-lite.
12-09-2003, 08:47 AM
asmithz

SOunds good, but what do you want to do with it, other then use it.
12-09-2003, 09:05 AM
RealitY

Quote:

Originally posted by Agent Smith@9 December 2003 - 00:47
SOunds good, but what do you want to do with it, other then use it.

I would like to know if its possible for it to Blow Me perhaps...
:P :P
12-09-2003, 09:08 AM
asmithz

;) :lol: :lol:
12-09-2003, 09:36 AM
justlooking

Quote:

Originally posted by REALITY+9 December 2003 - 10:05--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (REALITY @ 9 December 2003 - 10:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Agent Smith@9 December 2003 - 00:47
SOunds good, but what do you want to do with it, other then use it.

I would like to know if its possible for it to Blow Me perhaps...
:P :P[/b][/quote]
That's ridiculous. :P If you want to be blown use a vacuum cleaner like the rest of us. ;)
12-09-2003, 09:45 AM
RealitY

Quote:

Originally posted by justlooking+9 December 2003 - 01:36--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (justlooking @ 9 December 2003 - 01:36)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Quote:

Originally posted by REALITY@9 December 2003 - 10:05
<!--QuoteBegin-Agent Smith

Quote:

@9 December 2003 - 00:47
SOunds good, but what do you want to do with it, other then use it.

I would like to know if its possible for it to Blow Me perhaps...
:P :P

That's ridiculous. :P If you want to be blown use a vacuum cleaner like the rest of us. ;) [/b][/quote]
OOOOhhhh...

Thanks.
:lol: :lol:
12-09-2003, 10:39 AM
camille

Quote:

Originally posted by sharedholder@9 December 2003 - 14:54
No we don't have to merge the 2 programsj ust improve imesh like is done it in the past with K-lite.

Who's going to modify and improve it.
12-09-2003, 10:40 AM
Barbarossa

Quote:

Originally posted by REALITY@9 December 2003 - 02:15
I thought that the iMesh Clean was based on a version Fast Track that is before the newer KMD versions, thus if KL++ gets kicked off the network they may as well.

I have noticed in recent searches that there seem to be alot of KL++ users, this may be due to the lack of conectivity of regular KMD users. I have also noticed that @fileshare users show up as well, iMesh users. However if we were to merge together considering iMesh is not updated then there may be a decent amount of numbers between us...

Presumably any remaining Grokster users will fall into this category too.. :blink:
12-09-2003, 01:09 PM
sharedholder

Quote:

Originally posted by Agent Smith@9 December 2003 - 08:47
SOunds good, but what do you want to do with it, other then use it.

Improve imesh like is done it in the past with K-lite , adding tools ,auto searchmore ,etc...
12-09-2003, 04:22 PM
Kunal

Noone use imesh light! it contains loads of crap and messed up my freinds pc! do not install it on any account.

use clean imesh as sh said
12-09-2003, 04:38 PM
Vargas

well i think these dr damn releases are the best kazaa alternatives:
Bitzi Ticket- dr damn - Clean iMesh130.exe
Bitzi Ticket- dr damn - Clean Grokster 160.exe
12-11-2003, 04:13 AM
thedirtyd

i use iMesh-Light. it's probably the same as the Clean iMesh your talking about though. gets rid of all the crap and adds in

AVIPreview
PeerGuardian
Datview
K-Sig

they put up the light version of the newest imesh a few weeks ago. it works pretty good.
12-11-2003, 06:19 PM
SuBKulture

Quote:

Originally posted by barbarossa+9 December 2003 - 10:40--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (barbarossa @ 9 December 2003 - 10:40)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-REALITY@9 December 2003 - 02:15
I thought that the iMesh Clean was based on a version Fast Track that is before the newer KMD versions, thus if KL++ gets kicked off the network they may as well.

Presumably any remaining Grokster users will fall into this category too.. :blink: [/b][/quote]
Any blocking mechanism that Sharman use will only affect clients that identify themselves as being "Kazaa", as long as iMesh and Grokster continue to pay the bills to access the FastTrack network they wont be kicked off.
12-11-2003, 07:14 PM
rafi_d

Quote:

Originally posted by SuBKulture@11 December 2003 - 19:19
Any blocking mechanism that Sharman use will only affect clients that identify themselves as being "Kazaa", as long as iMesh and Grokster continue to pay the bills to access the FastTrack network they wont be kicked off.

How can Kazaa 2.6 "tell" if a client is KL K++ or Kazaa 2.4/5 ?
12-11-2003, 07:56 PM
SuBKulture

Quote:

Originally posted by rafi_d@11 December 2003 - 19:14
How can Kazaa 2.6 "tell" if a client is KL K++ or Kazaa 2.4/5 ?

It can't - Sharman need to get the majority of their pre 2.6 users to upgrade and then they can block all older versions, hacked or otherwise.
12-11-2003, 08:07 PM
rafi_d

Quote:

Originally posted by SuBKulture+11 December 2003 - 20:56--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SuBKulture @ 11 December 2003 - 20:56)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-rafi_d@11 December 2003 - 19:14
How can Kazaa 2.6 "tell" if a client is KL K++ or Kazaa 2.4/5 ?

It can't - Sharman need to get the majority of their pre 2.6 users to upgrade and then they can block all older versions, hacked or otherwise. [/b][/quote]

So, is the theory that V2.6 and it's supernodes are NOT accepting KL requests - true or false? (isolating the KL nodes from the network ?!)
12-11-2003, 08:17 PM
Explosive

Quote:

Originally posted by rafi_d+11 December 2003 - 21:07--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (rafi_d @ 11 December 2003 - 21:07)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Quote:

Originally posted by SuBKulture@11 December 2003 - 20:56
<!--QuoteBegin-rafi_d

Quote:

@11 December 2003 - 19:14
How can Kazaa 2.6 "tell" if a client is KL K++ or Kazaa 2.4/5 ?

It can't - Sharman need to get the majority of their pre 2.6 users to upgrade and then they can block all older versions, hacked or otherwise.

So, is the theory that V2.6 and it's supernodes are NOT accepting KL requests - true ot false? (isolating the KL nodes from the network ?!) [/b][/quote]
it's true
12-11-2003, 08:39 PM
rafi_d

Quote:

Originally posted by Explosive+11 December 2003 - 21:17--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Explosive @ 11 December 2003 - 21:17)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Quote:

Originally posted by rafi_d@11 December 2003 - 21:07

Quote:

Originally posted by SuBKulture@11 December 2003 - 20:56
<!--QuoteBegin-rafi_d

Quote:

Quote:

@11 December 2003 - 19:14
How can Kazaa 2.6 "tell" if a client is KL K++ or Kazaa 2.4/5 ?

It can't - Sharman need to get the majority of their pre 2.6 users to upgrade and then they can block all older versions, hacked or otherwise.

So, is the theory that V2.6 and it's supernodes are NOT accepting KL requests - true ot false? (isolating the KL nodes from the network ?!)

it's true[/b][/quote]
How can you ( Explosive & SuBKulture ) both be right ? Cannot distinguish between older versions of KL & Kazza but SN CAN do so ? and does klr fix that ?

May be we are going the worng way !!! :unsure: We should make a loader to Kazaa 2.6 that will just cancel the ability to "cut" KL clients off the network.
This is more important since it has to do with "survival" of the whole KL "network"/clients.

What do you think ?
12-11-2003, 08:49 PM
cosmic doobie

Random are you listening?? :unsure:
12-12-2003, 08:13 AM
Explosive

Both: iMesh clean and iMesh Lite install cydoor on your computer (Ad-aware found it after installation)...
12-12-2003, 08:48 AM
asmithz

Quote:

Originally posted by cosmic doobie@11 December 2003 - 12:49
Random are you listening?? :unsure:

RN dosen't care ;)
12-12-2003, 08:54 AM
rafi_d

Quote:

Originally posted by Agent Smith+12 December 2003 - 09:48--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agent Smith @ 12 December 2003 - 09:48)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-cosmic doobie@11 December 2003 - 12:49
Random are you listening?? :unsure:

RN dosen't care ;) [/b][/quote]
I suggest a bonus/donation of 1$ each to RN to show our appreciations, for making a new KL++ 2.6 version ... :)
12-12-2003, 09:04 AM
asmithz

Quote:

Originally posted by rafi_d+12 December 2003 - 00:54--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (rafi_d @ 12 December 2003 - 00:54)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Quote:

Originally posted by Agent Smith@12 December 2003 - 09:48
<!--QuoteBegin-cosmic doobie

Quote:

@11 December 2003 - 12:49
Random are you listening?? :unsure:

RN dosen't care ;)

I suggest a bonus/donation of 1$ each to RN to show our appreciations, for making a new KL++ 2.6 version ... :) [/b][/quote]
Hey i'd be all for that. :)
12-12-2003, 11:02 AM
BawA

No way i go back to imesh
it's shit :lol:
12-12-2003, 11:39 AM
asmithz

Quote:

Originally posted by bawa@Klite_user@12 December 2003 - 03:02
No way i go back to imesh
it's shit :lol:

I agree. :P
12-12-2003, 11:46 AM
Barbarossa

Quote:

Originally posted by rafi_d@11 December 2003 - 19:07

So, is the theory that V2.6 and it's supernodes are NOT accepting KL requests - true ot false? (isolating the KL nodes from the network ?!)

So far I haven't seen any evidence to suggest this is true.