I heard that Nforce2 Chipsets are not capable with Ati vid cards is this true?
Printable View
I heard that Nforce2 Chipsets are not capable with Ati vid cards is this true?
No.
I have a Asus board with that chipset and a Radeon card and they work just fine.
Like me, no problem with nforce2 and ati radeon. :huh:
I've a Abit mother board (nf7-s) and a radeon 9600xt 128Mo, and everything work very well under WinMe... :01:
The Nforce2 Chipset is a good choice.
i too have the nforce2 chipset, biostar m7ncd and an highteck ati radeon 9200se and no probs here under winxp
so whats so good about this chipset...?
I've heard it's better than the Via KT400..... but my board has never give any problems, so I stand by Via (since I haven't used nForce2)
I haven't in all my years seen a huge noticable difference between the two, they are pretty close neck and neck, i wouldn't worrie about wich one you buy, although the Nforce2 chipset is very popular...
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular
Well I don't have ddr400....could that be why? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 11:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular
I thought the KT600 Was on comparison level with the Nforce chipsets, not the 400.Quote:
Originally posted by DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 13:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular
I would definently get nForce 2. Works great with my Radeon 9700Pro.
I thought the KT600 Was on comparison level with the Nforce chipsets, not the 400. [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by _John_Lennon_+31 January 2004 - 11:52--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (_John_Lennon_ @ 31 January 2004 - 11:52)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-DarthInsinuate@31 January 2004 - 13:37
reviews prove Nforce2 is faster, marginally - but, they're highly rated, and the KT400 has issues with DDR400, which is probably why they're popular
John, check em out if you have time :D I don't :(
http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherb...814/index.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/motherbo...417/index.html
http://www20.tomshardware.com/motherboard/...1boards-01.html
http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherb...007/index.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20030701..._tuning-02.html
The last one has some info....didn't bother to look at it...
Bye :D
the only problem is that the agb bus has to be set to 66mhz in the bios when u r overclocking but as long as u do that then u have no problems