lol

[Alien5]

there were two before the busyedit. couldn't think of any other argumentative cunts.

So your busyedit actually made your post stupider and more banal than it already was?

Allen Vs All Sentient Lifeforms.

Whitewash for All Sentient Lifeforms.

yes

[chalice]

So your busyedit actually made your post stupider and more banal than it already was?

Allen Vs All Sentient Lifeforms.

Whitewash for All Sentient Lifeforms.

yes

A spectacular feat of idiocy there, Allen.

Congratulations.

[JPaul]

Now I'm not a homophobe I, along with many many others here @ FST, find it funny to call each other gay in a non conventional way knowing full well that none of us are in fact homosexual.

How do you know "...full well that none of us are in fact homosexual".

Is there some way you have of identifying homosexuals by the way they post.

You put things in your sig specifically intended to offend and to attack other people, you do this by using homosexuality as the "insult". It is clearly not badinage (to say otherwise would be a lie). That's not the same as people having a laugh, everyone can see that's clearly not the case when you are referring to me. I'll let Chalice speak for himself.

You're a homophobe, whether you know it or not.

[Alien5]

yes

A feat of idiocy there, Allen.

Congratulations.

thats why they call me 'spectacularly banal three or four edit idiot Allen'

[chalice]

Now I'm not a homophobe I, along with many many others here @ FST, find it funny to call each other gay in a non conventional way knowing full well that none of us are in fact homosexual.

How do you know "...full well that none of us are in fact homosexual".

Is there some way you have of identifying homosexuals by the way they post.

You put things in your sig specifically intended to offend and to attack other people, you do this by using homosexuality as the "insult". It is clearly not badinage (to say otherwise would be a lie). That's not the same as people having a laugh, everyone can see that's clearly not the case when you are referring to me. I'll let Chalice speak for himself.

You're a homophobe, whether you know it or not.

To me, his sig signifies nothing but his lack of imagination. I had put him in my sig for about a day but the joke wore pretty thin on me pretty quickly, which is why I removed it. I actually asked him to put me in his sig so he could demonstrate to the entire board his puerile homophobia disguised as 'internet slang'. Guess what. He fell for it like I knew he would.

He can keep me in his sig for as long as he likes. It does him more damage than it does me.

[JPaul]

Agreed, I've no problem with him having it there. Like you say it just demonstrates what he is. Well in addition to the rudeness and aggression. He would actually be quite a catch for a gay man. Do you think it might be the latent thing, that would make a bit of sence.

I really loved ""...full well that none of us are in fact homosexual". That's genious self pwnage.

[Alien5]

he's almost made our minds up for us that we're faggot haters just like him. or is that a bit harsh alice?

Edited bad grammar for alice.

[chalice]

Once again, Allen, only this time in English, please.

[chalice]

He's almost made our minds up for us that we're faggot haters just like him. Or is that a bit harsh alice?

Edited bad grammar for alice.

Fixed.

To make up your mind, you are first required to have one, Allen.

Good grammar or not, you're still talking absolute balls.

Have you moved out of your mum's house yet, seeing as you're earning minimum wage now? Or are those knots in the apron strings just too complicated for you to undo?

Poor woman.

[Alien5]

you talk absolute balls all the time, bollockface.

thats what i like about you.