What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]

[KennyX]

Moving all the sites under level nine up by a level is not the ideal solution. I don't like the idea of 1/2's (or asterisk's) though, and thought this was one of the reasons for moving away from the level 1-5 scale that was used before.

Move all the sometimes, or often, open registration trackers into level 1; all the permanently open for signups into a new level 0, since they are not really in the level system. This splits them up without disturbing the higher level trackers.

^^like hdbits, revTT, tl, TR, dvdclub.

a lot of trackers go in between 2 and 3. instead of making a 2.5, scale it so hard to obtain lvl 2(like scc, bithq, christian torrents) move up to 3, hard to obtain lvl3 (like hdbits, revTT, tl, TR, dvdclub) move to 4, and so on.

lvl 2 is way to broad!

Bithq is open signups one day a month so there is no chance it should be level three. RevTT and TDC are easy to get as new PU's get invites.

However, a lot of the level three sites have strong arguments for going up a level: HDBits has no invites just now and high demand, Filelist no invites ever, Snowtigers replaces about one user a day, PeerPortal very few invites (still dont think this should even be a level three site though and am surprised that it started there), and for BTMusic I have seen people trade S*T to get it. Some have arguments for being moved down: TTi has lots of invites available and it is very easy to get more (user limit problem though), what and to a slightly lesser extent waffles can be very easily picked up. Even SCC has too many invites floating around.


"lvl 2 is way to broad!", yes because getting into them very easy. A lot of these trackers have one or more of these conditions:
massive numbers of users with invites, like IPT
massive number of invites, like TD
very easy to get invites (20 karma=3 invites sort of thing), like loads of them.
recently open for mass signups, like TvT.ro
Recently closed, like bitnation.
no one wants/cares about them (as most of them are considered poor relative to higher level sites in peoples opinion), and this is the most common reason.

They do not deserve a higher level.


ScL: level 2 as it has opened signups yet again. has it doubled its membership in the last few weeks? New rule idea, if a site opens signups for 500 or more users it automatically moves down to level 2 if above it?

scc level 3
RevTT level 4
TL level 4
what u say?

SCC, loads of invites available, so I think level three is good. Possibly reduce it.

TL, maybe, I know some people still have many invites but they have no intention of using them, I think this one needs serious consideration for moving up to level four. On the other hand at least fifty new VIP's per month equals 200 new invites added every month.

RevTT, loads of invites available and every invitee gets two more at PU, so should stay at level three.


lovejj, have to agree that IPlay should be considered for down a level as there seem to be a lot of invites available and many are being given away.


Start ifi at level two.


edit: just noticed the missing posts are back.

edit: https://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...eaway-302328/? can I have asked for more support for TTi to level two?

[fOrUmAs]

Why SCL still in lvl 5 ?!!!!!
it opened signups so manytimes for long period. this is not fair and i think iTS should go 1 lvl up.

because no one cares anymore

this list is dead for long time now IMO

[stroj]

Yeah, ppl cant have their epeens any bigger so they gave up.

[stoi]

Everyone knows by now, i hate this thread.

But why is it called What Trackers Are Worth. when its actually, How hard it is to get in.

What trackers are worth means to me.

What you have to pay to get into them, or what you have to trade at the very least, and that includes accounts.

This goes against the whole premise of P2P and bittorrent in general.

Its like all trackers going.

only way you can download a torrent on a tracker, is if you offer something in return (and not just BW), until you do that, then all torrents are offlimits. and 1 torrent = you get 1 torent to download.

Now im sure if every tracker done that, there would be outcry, but this WTAW thread seems to get away with the same principle.

We are here to share, not trade and pay for stuff.

[bilkenter]

Also stoi, the more they label them as level 5 level 6 level 8, the more people struggle to get into them since they are seen to be best. People are greedy after all

[SgtMajor]

Why SCL still in lvl 5 ?!!!!!
it opened signups so manytimes for long period. this is not fair and i think iTS should go 1 lvl up.

because no one cares anymore

this list is dead for long time now IMO

That's probably the best post you've ever made here, /fact.

[lovejj]

i think ppl will do better in high lvl
high lvl mean ppl will appreciate the tracket

[bilkenter]

not at all, i have met someone recently who cheated on ftn via ratio cheating... People dont appreciate it, i am sure people who dont have it will be much more valuable than him

[stoi]

i think ppl will do better in high lvl
high lvl mean ppl will appreciate the tracket

Why is that though?

because of this stupid thread.

BCG is level 2, but we are far from crap, and are probably better (even though im not a member of any, and im not rubbishing other trackers) than some lvl 5-10 trackers.

no one cares about lvl 1 trackers, but if they closed their doors, no invites, nothing, in 2 years they will be lvl 5-6, but they still have the same members and content as before.

its a load of crap.

[bilkenter]

agreed on it, people say ftn or fsc are the great ones. But the funny thing, they havent even seen what is in there...From what i heard, it isnt the best for everyone...some people may appreciate it, some dont... Level means nothing actually... At least mostly it is all about what you need... and where you find it For e****, i heard that it is great for old music and so forth... I am not into old music at all, therefore, even if it is level 20 it doesnt matter at all...