yeah it was dead b4 i started as well but this isnt even the first thread i've seen basically dedicated to ScT... must have been something amazing!
O and i figure ill just throw my 2 cents in here but honestly its not that bad to skim a little off the top if you are running a torrent site... its like if ppl are using your house to sell drugs... you know with that amt of traffic theres going to be heat on you and if you get caught you are going down not every1 who chills in the house so why shouldnt you at least benefit from it a little
from the way ppl talk the staff and owner still did their job and made it one of if not the best tracker on the net so its not as if they were just half assing and leeching money from unsuspecting users. Apparently they did their jobs quite well and so they should be rewarded especially in a buisness as risky as theirs...
and that point just takes into account their involvement in a tracker much less one of the most popular and possibly best trackers available which is obviously going to bring more scrutiny and heat from the authority figures...
maybe its time those who are bitter just move on and assume the best
if one of your good friends died, someone who would give their ass for you even if it risked their own, just suddenly passed away would you want to defile his memory after he is gone. No you wouldnt even if you knew everything wrong he did and what he said and did to ppl, that were mourning him and talking about how amazing he was , behind their back you would still just keep your mouth shut and appreciate what he did for you and let him pass in peace. Once they are gone there is no reason to continue to try and defile the memory of something great especially if you were one of the many who enjoyed its presence in life. is there? so taking this into account if you were the staff and knew something whether bad or good about the downfall of the site or your friend would you expose that to the world when honestly it makes no difference either way because it/they are gone no matter what you say... So why should you the friends and users of it mock it after its passing...
@merwais, Wizzcameron, QPD, ringhunter, etc i think you guys have the right idea... appreciate it for what it was. There will never be anything exactly the same but it was good while it lasted.
For the rest if you were insulting directly or bashing the staff for "buying cars" etc with donation money this isnt directed at you and for those of you who did its just my opinion and i dont mean to offend anyone so please dont be
Last edited by anonymous0711; 04-01-2010 at 11:25 AM.
-2
Very well put and I agree that ScT innovated a lot of what are now common practices in BT. ScT does deserve respect. However, I still feel that ScT did lose it's way at one point and changed for the worst, along with the rest of the BT community.
A perfect example of this is merwais' comment:
It's this kind of attitude that is killing BT. Since when did it ever become acceptable to buy your way into trackers? I'm going to assume it became acceptable when trackers (ScT) started selling invites to donors.
I have nothing but respect for what ScT once was, the innovations it made and the tight community it inherited from EliteTorrents, but I still feel that it degenerated into something rather unsavoury. In the end, it had become filled with level-seekers, invite sellers and traders.
In the end, it wasn't filled with level seekers / invite sellers / traders at all. The user total for accounts ever made was in and around the 50,000 mark after 4 and a half years and with the site at full capacity (20,000), that is about 30 accounts a day were made. With SCC currently at 145,000 accounts mark and been up 3 and a half years, this equals to about 113 accounts a day being made. If the site was filled with these people you say, it would of been the same as SCC or higher. The last 2 days since we announced the closure we allowed other site staff to offer invites on our forums, which again isn't anything like unsavoury. ScT didn't sell anything, it gave back to the users rewards for donating.
Get your facts straight.
Last edited by Feeling; 04-01-2010 at 03:52 PM.
Those numbers could just as easily be interpreted as showing that SCC is just more vigilant in catching and banning bad users.
I don't want to seem like I'm a SCC fanboy or anything (I'm not a fan of scene stuff). I'll admit that ScT did a lot more for BT than SCC ever could and it was a better site. However, it still remains that ScT shut down under shady circumstances with nothing in the news about any kind of charges, as you had previously implied there would be.
Aye!whattup fee,word was you got mauled at some chinese zoo,herd twas a bear,you tried feeding it from the wrong end I herd.
Also herd u was in rehab and they made 'FREE FEE! t's too,l337 shit u done.Herd you traded the yacht for axx to untouched taliban cocaine too.Army found out and kicked you out implying don't ask don't tell as the reason.
But all in all you are still here.
well good points you've put but am afraid the only thing I'll agree with you on is your suggestion that IMDB should start indexing porn titles as well.Otherwise if you were paying attention,you would notice that feeling aint dead.He posted right above you so relax and wish him well.He is even using facts and straight in the same sentence so he's become better.
SCT was one of a kind.The only shitty thing was that global ban without exceptions...
Too often, we loose sight of life's simple pleasures.Remember, when someone annoys you it takes 42 muscles in your face to frown, BUT, it only takes 4 muscles to extend your arm and bitch-slap that mother!%$@%# upside the head!
Bookmarks