Scc

[A]

Nah not really.I don't like to 'chit chat' with trash like you.Wasn't that obvious?

Nah not really. I think I was confused by the mixed signals of you calling me trash, and continuing to argue infantile points that only trash would care about.

Which you are exactly doing now and when you were "following the conversation" before?

[senegal]

Make love, not war!

[Slickerey]

I decide to give out an invite and everyone provides me with free entertainment. Maybe I should give invites out more often...

[whatcdfan]

I decide to give out an invite and everyone provides me with free entertainment. Maybe I should give invites out more often...

if u wud have had pinched a smiley along with it wud have become more interesting

[senegal]

I decide to give out an invite and everyone provides me with free entertainment. Maybe I should give invites out more often...

if u wud have had pinched a smiley along with it wud have become more interesting

that's very unlikely.

[whatcdfan]

bcoz i didnt got his mood is he angry or is he celebrating.........a smiley wud have helped

Make love, not war!

mind u iam not gay and it isnt a war its a debate..........

[senegal]

seems like a war from my chair.

[Quarterquack]

Which you are exactly doing now and when you were "following the conversation" before?

Are you actually this thick? I've quickly drafted up a rearrangement of who wins this thread's stupidity title:

1) AbyBeats - For exceptional stupidity in ignoring all forms of wit, insisting insults can win him an argument, being a great judge on all things trash or not, and failing to follow conversations in post/tree form. (The funny part is he will regret winning this argument because he thought the runners-up were both less intelligent than himself.)
2) whatcdfan - For truly pointing out what racists armed with visions of righteousness are capable of when given a keyboard.
3) Barclays - Even though at first it seemed like he was in the lead, he later proved he was unfit for the title for catching on to one instance of sarcasm. Pity, I had some money down on him. Cut the soccer references out, though, bro.

[whatcdfan]

Which you are exactly doing now and when you were "following the conversation" before?

Are you actually this thick? I've quickly drafted up a rearrangement of who wins this thread's stupidity title:

1) AbyBeats - For exceptional stupidity in ignoring all forms of wit, insisting insults can win him an argument, being a great judge on all things trash or not, and failing to follow conversations in post/tree form. (The funny part is he will regret winning this argument because he thought the runners-up were both less intelligent than himself.)
2) whatcdfan - For truly pointing out what racists armed with visions of righteousness are capable of when given a keyboard.
3) Barclays - Even though at first it seemed like he was in the lead, he later proved he was unfit for the title for catching on to one instance of sarcasm. Pity, I had some money down on him. Cut the soccer references out, though, bro.

now u r showing some intelligence u think u can surround me in ur racism theory...........well good luck
neither do i challenge ur history and current events knowledge
and +1 for creativity in ur last post.......................
but whatever you shouldn't have said anything related to abybeats familia

[A]

Which you are exactly doing now and when you were "following the conversation" before?

Are you actually this thick? I've quickly drafted up a rearrangement of who wins this thread's stupidity title:

1) AbyBeats - For exceptional stupidity in ignoring all forms of wit, insisting insults can win him an argument, being a great judge on all things trash or not, and failing to follow conversations in post/tree form. (The funny part is he will regret winning this argument because he thought the runners-up were both less intelligent than himself.)

k
and this is what ringhunter means by "following conversations"

I'm really not the one incapable of following a conversation here. Don't tell me you don't know what "a conversation" constitutes? For most 5th graders it's what occurs when two non-neanderthals converse phonetically (more recently digitally) for longer than two bloody sentences. Research has shown that lesser evolved beings have difficulty with the latter part of the previous sentence, though. As proof, I'm sure you had to pause at my referencing part of my rebuttal, instead of simply memorizing it.

and beware of ringhunter's high grade wits and also remember he doesn't insult anyone one.