I think I just end up getting trolled on dating sites

[Squeamous]

I've noticed that the more Mary is required to think, the more pedantic she gets, until the exchange degenerates into blow-by-blow deconstruction of semantics. I've decided to frustrate this process by replying in detail along a slightly dissimilar vein to her previous comment. I'll let you all know how I get on

If I were to paste that template onto what just transpired between Artie and myself, you're saying Dave is a subject that requires thought. To be fair, you've attempted to focus the origination of rumination from my mind, but it still dons your stamp of credibility. However, given that the Rubik's cube of a personality breakdown of Dave revealed a Bazooka Joe, I'm aghast at the notion that you feel the subject of Dave is anything other than a sequence of neuron misfires.

No no no, what you're doing there is just saying words to try to confuse me, which is unecessary wordiness rather than diversion.
I was talking about your penchant for OCD breakdowns of a point to the degree where it becomes meaningless. A bit like looking at a Monet too close. The subject of your exchange with Artie couldn't have been of less interest to me.

Of course, I don't intend to play my games with you on demand or in a predictable way. I hope you understand x

Do any of them know the difference between a ketone and a carboxylic acid, or do you all just wash off your fingernail polish with vinegar?

Do I look like I know how to remove fingernail polish?

Photo0653.jpg

[mjmacky]

No no no, what you're doing there is just saying words to try to confuse me, which is unecessary wordiness rather than diversion.
I was talking about your penchant for OCD breakdowns of a point to the degree where it becomes meaningless. A bit like looking at a Monet too close. The subject of your exchange with Artie couldn't have been of less interest to me.

Of course, I don't intend to play my games with you on demand or in a predictable way. I hope you understand x

I wasn't trying to confuse you

I was making a game of my own pedantry but I think you don't want to play that game either.

As for the nail polish, let me be the second person after your chemistry teacher to say that vinegar won't work.

[Squeamous]

I wasn't trying to confuse you

I was making a game of my own pedantry but I think you don't want to play that game either.

As for the nail polish, let me be the second person after your chemistry teacher to say that vinegar won't work.

I know the difference between acetic acid and acetone thank you very much

[mjmacky]

I know the difference between acetic acid and acetone thank you very much

I can't believe you finally said that, looks like we're having horse steaks tonight.

[Squeamous]

I know the difference between acetic acid and acetone thank you very much

I can't believe you finally said that, looks like we're having horse steaks tonight.

That was actually quick for me

[megabyteme]

I'm not yet at a breaking point to compromise on my perfect partner and settle for something less. Plus, it's not necessarily my polyamorous behavior on the witness stand, but my future partner's. As it stands, Ivana has seen at least 2 to 3 times more action than me. I think it would be silly of me to expect to find a partner who will pledge her sexuality only to me for the length of our relationship.

This could all be because it's not that big of a deal to me. Maybe that's because I'm not all that crazy about it as everyone else, thus I put a lot less weight on it. Should I keep going on about this?

I realize I'm quite late to this conversation, but either macky is in denial, or he's managed to get laid 60 times.

[mjmacky]

I don't even know a dozen women willing to sleep with me, but if you think I'm going to let that affect my numbers...

[mjmacky]

This thread used to be filled with a variety of correspondences that I posted after manky and squeams, who tried to make it all about me, wandered off into the night. Since those two won't be back soon, it's time to get bulimic.

Foreword:
The current girlfriend and I did meet through the dating site, and she knows I still fuck around under my profile. Actually, I'm not sure if she knows the extent of it, only that I'm not trying to meet people. My profile has a disclaimer now that I'm attached and not looking for anything. The aforementioned extents to follow...

[mjmacky]

Blahblah12 23 July, 2013, 01:18
Hi

Mary 23 July, 2013, 01:29
You must have missed the update I just posted (about my availability and opinion on lame messages) or you want to be verbally mutilated. To clarify, "Hi" sucks as a message between two strangers with no given context. You also didn't bother to see that there are a million ways I'd upset you (examining the questions).

I'm not trying to be cruel, but that's reality, them's the breaks, that's how the cookie crumbles, those are where the chips lay, and all of those other idioms.

You are really gorgeous, so I guess that's why you think saying hi is enough. Maybe it is in most cases, but this tree is a bit snappy.

Blahblah12 23 July, 2013, 06:47
I said hi before reading your profile. I didn't bother to talk further. People like you bring a bad name to sites like these. Though you started dating someone, you still have your profile. It's annoying and lengthy. I don't care what you are. You look like a psychopath.

Mary 23 July, 2013, 08:24
That's because you limit your view of this site to being purely about seeking relationships. I, on the other hand, acknowledge its social and entertainment values. I'm not out looking for action, which is why I added the new disclaimer. I would say I'm quite in the clear here.

Do you not see the irony of making a claim that a certain type of individual depreciates the quality of a site when in fact you sent a message without reading the profile? I'm quite psychotic and revel in its pleasures, but I do have the wherewithal to read up on someone before sending a message lest I end up in an undesired conversation.

Blahblah12 23 July, 2013, 10:02
Why would someone read your big profile. Even if they read, why would someone contact you even if you are dating someone unless they are still looking. This explains what kind of a person you are. I don't want to be told by a person like you what kind of s person I am. I know what I am and no one said I am psychotic.

Mary 23 July, 2013, 19:45
Because my profile is entertaining, I get compliments on it regularly. I am also quite proud of the Frankenstein creation it has become and for those reasons, I have no plans to take it down in the foreseeable future. I will continue to engage in platonic conversations and disregard romantic gestures as I've been doing for awhile. The process runs like clockwork despite your utter confusion of the matter. If you wish, I could try to explain the interest of others who are on here do not have a narrowly focused agenda.

You're the kind of person who just messages people without knowing anything about them, that's all that was said. It's a self-evident fact that did not require my narration whether you desire it or not. You are not well equipped for arguing a point, and I'm feeling a little bit like an abuser here. Step it up or forfeit.

Blahblah12 24 July, 2013, 09:53
I don't know why I am talking to you. And fyki this is not an entertainment site. I am not interested in you. So get that thing out of your brain. And keep entertaining people if that is what you are looking at. Good bye and good luck.

Mary 24 July, 2013, 10:09
That was never in my brain. You kept messaging me because you don't think before you act. If you gave your impulses any dedicated contemplation, you would have realized your own foolishness.

Whether or not the site has the label of entertainment has no relation to one's ability to extract entertainment from it. You have a difficult time understanding this because you haven't had much exercise with critical thought. You should have bailed out long ago, but you seem to have a desperate desire for last words even if there is little substance to them.

Blahblah12 25 July, 2013, 12:09
Ok...ovee and out. I am unnecessarily having a controversy with you I guess. and I hate fighting with people. I wish you good luck!!

Mary 25 July, 2013, 17:18
Antagonism isn't the same as fighting. Also, that's a weak and unsubstantiated cop out given your first reply. Pleasantries are superficial subversions, so I'll leave you with this advice. Practice debating with people to expand your own self-discovery.

Blahblah12 28 July, 2013, 03:16
I agree. I just didn't have patience to typr long messages like you. Trust me when it comes to debates and controversies, I will be the first person.

Mary 28 July, 2013, 07:55
You mean the last person.

Blahblah12 28 July, 2013, 11:17
Keep thinking that you are winning. But truth will remain the same.

Mary 29 July, 2013, 20:48
What exactly do you think the contest is here? To me, it seems like the only thing being validated is my assessment of the continued efforts on your part. I didn't actually expect you to follow suit after I made the call, but you falling in line so easily makes me think you might be a 12-year-old boy in reality.

In that case, you are violating the TOS, but since you probably don't have any regard for them and I can only demonstrate that through deduction, I will have to emphasize that you should not divulge any personal information and do not attempt to meet anyone on here. The dangers of the Internet still exist, and your parents should have prepared you a little more for this new world. Consider that sage advice and ponder upon it.

Blahblah12 30 July, 2013, 00:05
I don't know how come you have so much time in talking to strangers. I wouldn't waste my time

Mary 30 July, 2013, 01:59
You should waste another moment to appreciate the irony. The few minutes it takes to retort does not cause me an iota of hardship. So, the small amount of time it takes to break your balls and entertain myself is all win on my side of the equation. Keep it coming.

[megabyteme]

Mary 8; Young, full-of-herself, waste of a night out 0.

If only enough others took the time to kick chicks like this in the chops, the world might be a better place. Thank you for your public service (and the chuckles), Mary.