boycotts of Danish goods in middle East!

[Busyman]

http://www.answers.com/topic/theo-va...ector?method=6

Thank you very much.

Read, B.

I know who Theo was, j2 and why he was killed. (and who doesn't?)

I was being sarcastic about folks dying. Jeez.

There's also a black Muslim lady that is part of the government in Amsterdam who needs protection 'cause she spoke out about how women are treated in Islam.

[j2k4]

Thank you very much.

Read, B.

I know who Theo was, j2 and why he was killed. (and who doesn't?)

I was being sarcastic about folks dying. Jeez.

There's also a black Muslim lady that is part of the government in Amsterdam who needs protection 'cause she spoke out about how women are treated in Islam.

Sarcasm...oh, yeah!

I'm aware of the Muslim lady and won't require a link because I'm foregoing sarcasm.

[BawA]

as some of you may know there is a boycotts of Danish goods in middle east from past few days because of a Danish news paper by making ridicules cartoon of Prophet Mohammad(pbuh), also few countries including sudia Arabia and labia withdraw their ambassadors from there, I want to point a view of mine.
http://www.upi.com/InternationalInte...0-052626-1117r

In the answer to why did this news paper made that cartoon they said it was to show the freedom of speech, I want to know what kind of freedom is that, even if that is stepping over our moral believes. To me it was very stupid comment that they were showing freedom of speech, they could go on political leaders but they had to make fun of religious matters. maybe to them religious matter is noting and they can make fun of Jesus as they regularly do(no offence meant, we believe in him and have huge respect for him, prophet Eesa is mentioned with respect in Quran) any time they want but that doesn’t work here, we don’t tolerate with those kind of things. The news paper site was destroyed by a hacker and was back last days and apologized in a way that "we got it wrong".
Denmark ambassador in Saudi Arabia said 100million damage was made overall middle east in few days cuz of boycotts, and now the foreign minister is waiting for an act by our governments for what is happening, I say how the feck they can blem us for whets happening, we deserve an apologies and they asking us for one.
These boycotts will continue even if Denmark government apologies so it could be a lesson for those who think they can go away with this kind of act.

Since I'm bored, here's why this is fucking stupid:

It wasn't denmark (or later on norway) that did it, it was one newspaper, and not one speaking for the danish governement, or the danish people.

They've got this thing called freedom of speech, where the government doesn't censor papers before they are published. Sure, it's prolly really stupid, and maybe hurtful, but it wasn't the work of the danish people. Yet you'd mess with their economy, and also that of norway, since the drawings were published there too.

It's not the entire danish people's fault, it's the idiots running the paper(s). And, last I checked it wasn't a paper intended for your market, fuck, I'd never have heard of this if it hadn't been for this idiocy, and compared to you I live next door.

So you are screwing with a couple of nations far away from you, over something a few people printed in one of their papers.

Kinda' makes me think of when other idiots blame all arabs for the actions of a few deranged terrorists.




Far as I'm concerned, those members of the danish people who had done nothing wrong here can blame you for any economical problems, if you stand by it, 'cos what you want to do is to mess with an entire people, of which not even one percent are guilty of this particular crime, and that's no more right than publishing the stuff in the first place.

its our choice if we choose to stop a certin thing, isnt that a freedom of act?
now tell me how the fuck freedom of speech is fair to you but freedom of act is not.
we dont like to do this but when west's dont care about us and they dont listen to us we must goto this kind of alternative action's.
like france cencoring the right of a muslim laidy of wearing her hejab(scarf), how would u feel if hejab was compulsory here even to non muslims?
all am saying when justise can be made by peace we have alternative ways and its our choice to boyccotts some thing.

[maebach]

But you cant generalise all of the west hating islam just because one paper published something.

[Busyman]

Since I'm bored, here's why this is fucking stupid:

It wasn't denmark (or later on norway) that did it, it was one newspaper, and not one speaking for the danish governement, or the danish people.

They've got this thing called freedom of speech, where the government doesn't censor papers before they are published. Sure, it's prolly really stupid, and maybe hurtful, but it wasn't the work of the danish people. Yet you'd mess with their economy, and also that of norway, since the drawings were published there too.

It's not the entire danish people's fault, it's the idiots running the paper(s). And, last I checked it wasn't a paper intended for your market, fuck, I'd never have heard of this if it hadn't been for this idiocy, and compared to you I live next door.

So you are screwing with a couple of nations far away from you, over something a few people printed in one of their papers.

Kinda' makes me think of when other idiots blame all arabs for the actions of a few deranged terrorists.




Far as I'm concerned, those members of the danish people who had done nothing wrong here can blame you for any economical problems, if you stand by it, 'cos what you want to do is to mess with an entire people, of which not even one percent are guilty of this particular crime, and that's no more right than publishing the stuff in the first place.

its our choice if we choose to stop a certin thing, isnt that a freedom of act?
now tell me how the fuck freedom of speech is fair to you but freedom of act is not.
we dont like to do this but when west's dont care about us and they dont listen to us we must goto this kind of alternative action's.
like france cencoring the right of a muslim laidy of wearing her hejab(scarf), how would u feel if hejab was compulsory here even to non muslims?
all am saying when justise can be made by peace we have alternative ways and its our choice to boyccotts some thing.

That's the fucking problem.

You just grouped entire nations based on what a newspaper published.

Then you issue fucking fatwahs based on the same shit.

So you not only boycott a nations goods based on a newspaper article, which although I find stupid, it's your right. You then make those folk targets for assassination.

Until you so-called Muslims change your stilted view then fuck off.

When I studied Islam way back, my uncle warned me about The Nation Of Islam and enlightened thinkers like yourself.

..and if the west has a stilted view of folks like yourself, blame 9-11. You have never had such a backlash in the modern era until then. You sympathize with terrorists.

You have an institution of hate. The most ubiquitous remark, "I don't condone 9-11 but I understand why they did it."

They are fucking idiots. They killed other Muslims that day.

Nice going.

Oh and for the record I don't hate Islam in the least.

[BawA]

But you cant generalise all of the west hating islam just because one paper published something.

come on, talk to your self... most of west countries after 9/11 change thier point of view and actions againts islam world, which country didnt harden solutions for us?
a news paper always provides what one nation thinks cuz thier part of nation and the people who write it think as them and are not diffrent generaly.
didnt in denmark thing suddenly changed and there were attacks on muslims after killing the Van Gogh, wasnt that racism becuz one muslim guy killed him?

[BawA]

That's the fucking problem.

You just grouped entire nations based on what a newspaper published.

Then you issue fucking fatwahs based on the same shit.

So you not only boycott a nations goods based on a newspaper article, which although I find stupid, it's your right. You then make those folk targets for assassination.

Until you so-called Muslims change your stilted view then fuck off.

When I studied Islam way back, my uncle warned me about The Nation Of Islam and enlightened thinkers like yourself.

..and if the west has a stilted view of folks like yourself, blame 9-11. You have never had such a backlash in the modern era until then. You sympathize with terrorists.

You have an institution of hate. The most ubiquitous remark, "I don't condone 9-11 but I understand why they did it."

They are fucking idiots. They killed other Muslims that day.

Nice going.

Oh and for the record I don't hate Islam in the least.

where the fuck did u heared that there is a fatwa going on, nobody issued one to boyccot danish good, people did that by thier own belives, cuz our union in muslim world is strong atleast in religion matters.
make some research before u talk dont just go on "fatwah, fatwah", do u even know whats fatwah

[Busyman]

But you cant generalise all of the west hating islam just because one paper published something.

come on, talk to your self... most of west countries after 9/11 change thier point of view and actions againts islam world, which country didnt harden solutions for us?
a news paper always provides what one nation thinks cuz thier part of nation and the people who write it think as them and are not diffrent generaly.
didnt in denmark thing suddenly changed and there were attacks on muslims after killing the Van Gogh, wasnt that racism becuz one muslim guy killed him?

There's the problem in your thinking right there. Are you that fucking stupid?

This is why you think it's ok to target the average joe when shit goes down.
Then you'll sit back and say, "it wasn't me it was some guy" at the same time sympathetic to that "some guy".

Fuck off.

[Busyman]

people did that by thier own belives, cuz our union is muslim world is strong atleast in religion matters.

Oh so it's safe to say you all think alike.

[BawA]

There's the problem in your thinking right there. Are you that fucking stupid?

This is why you think it's ok to target the average joe when shit goes down.
Then you'll sit back and say, "it wasn't me it was some guy" at the same time sympathetic to that "some guy".

Fuck off.

no am not talking off my ass like you, check that last poll of danish people regarding this matter, over 80% people said not to opologize for making thoes cartoon, what u say about that, i say they all think same but to cover the matter up they use the "F"(freedom) word, again i say freedom is not to disrespet others moral and beliving values.