Like I said my suggestion is basically there as an after the fact resource. Meaning, basically the app is just an invite that people have to put some effort into getting to know their invitee before they generate it. It is only if the inviter invites a bad member (cheater, trader, etc.) that the application actually will be reviewed. Based on the quality of the responses on the application they can see if the inviter actually put any effort into the application or not. If it seems that the inviter put a half-assed effort into the application and if they keep inviting losers, then they face consequences.
Now, the reason I put in things like speed and stats from quality trackers, I meant them to be there as benchmarks. If the invitee has X speed and has Dl/ul x amount from x trackers, when he gets invited and then he gets caught for cheating then it means that it's possible that the inviter wasn't putting any attention into that persons stats. The quality of a tracker is relative to what kind of tracker that my invite policy would be invited too . IE if your running a community tracker than stats from the big F's and whatnot could be considered quality.
Bookmarks