-
-
-
10-02-2010, 08:04 AM
vBCms Comments -
#2
Poster
I guess it moves up a notch. Gives the money grubbers something to think about hey
-
-
10-02-2010, 10:00 AM
vBCms Comments -
#3
I smell a rat here. This group is typically non-hostile. A bomb threat is more likely to be a BS tactic of the "lawyers" to get the police to pursue the DDoS attacks than be a true threat.
One of the recent articles posted here said the MPAA was trying to link copyright infringement with terrorism. Sounds like the same cowardly shit to me...
-
-
10-02-2010, 12:59 PM
vBCms Comments -
#4
Poster
This definitely isn't by the DDoS people. They've got a good thing going and this would ruin them which so I agree with you megabyteme about the lawyers plot
-
-
10-02-2010, 06:47 PM
vBCms Comments -
#5
Poster
This would be taking it one step to far in my opinion. One: the DDoS attack just targets the company as a whole where a bomb threat is way more to a personal level. Two: It cost the tax-payers money.
Like people said however this might be an independant action by people not involved with the DDoS attacks or even a conspiracy.
-
-
10-02-2010, 06:55 PM
vBCms Comments -
#6
Poster
This doesn't sound like a group of internet pranksters to me. A bomb threat is an act of active terrorism, IMO. It seems like the law firm is trying to connect this perhaps-unrelated event to a DDoS
-
-
10-03-2010, 05:24 AM
vBCms Comments -
#7
Poster
yea thats stupid and crossing the line. ddos is one thing but a bomb threat? thats just bad bad bad. also like previously said, that is a blow to the innocent taxpayers as well.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks