Assuming EA would not break the same Steam RulesOriginally Posted by iLOVENZB
Assuming EA would not break the same Steam Rules
Hey! Isn't EA the game developer that refused to release games without securom even though it was a pain to customers but not pirates? And isn't it EA that wanted to release all their games with a limited number of installs? And isn't it me who will not fall for their greedy crap this time as well?
an alchemist?
Yes to all, and it's weird how I look at a game developer before considering a game nowadays. That's something I never did when I was younger, but the bullshit they've been pulling recently begs the consumer to pay attention. EA has to bring a lot of interest in a game before I would even consider to grab a pirated copy (let alone pay for it), like hell I'd become a member of yet another site just to get one of their games. That's sort of the point with Steam (and others), centralized store that cuts through the bullshit.
Last edited by mjmacky; 06-16-2011 at 08:45 PM.
You are correct. But I sure as hell will be overlooking those facts when I buy BF3!!!
an alchemist?
No wonder we are continuously forced to deal with this crap, suckers flood the consumer market
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks