Do you think a fool of me...Originally posted by junkyardking@11 December 2003 - 23:51
Have you got the latest firmware for your router?
![]()
![]()
Yes of course I do.
Do you think a fool of me...Originally posted by junkyardking@11 December 2003 - 23:51
Have you got the latest firmware for your router?
![]()
![]()
Yes of course I do.
Just a couple of bugs we're trying to resolve, though I am impressed...Originally posted by Agent Smith@12 December 2003 - 01:01
Just got anonx, i got to say this kicks ass.![]()
Reality,
Yes, AnonX is has NAT qualities. You are virtually connected to a WAN.
Issues 1- 4 are ARP issues. There are problems with NAT---NAT ARPs. I need to change some code to fix this. I will get back to you withan update. The easy solution would be to put a whole in the NAT, but this would leave you vunerable. NOT A SOLUTION.![]()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. IRC - CANNOT upload, can download (my main issue).
2. BT - Yellow light, indicating I CANNOT conect to all sources such as others behind a NAT/router. This could be what causes the speeds with Annox to be slower on BT since you have access to fewer sources. (as said a fair trade off)
3. Emule - Low ID (not that I care but it proves the same point, when using Emule if you have a router and do not set up port fowarding you WILL get a LOW ID, it appears as Anonx is acting as a NAT/router)
4. SoulSeek - Can access and view files from all users EXCEPT for those behind a NAT/router.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a'right keep us updated![]()
Okay,
James and Reality I made the first phase of changes. Which was to use fast ip packet forwarding on all traffic. This should increase your speed. Plus it handles the 1024 to 65000 ports differently than before. It might solve the problem, but I think the ultimate solution comes in phase 2.
The second phase I will use some ARP MASQs to pass curtain network traffic. This will require tweaking. I will get back to you when I am done.
Cheers,
good work anonxo
the news of anonx service has spread in the p2p world, you guys should soon be VERY busy with customer support![]()
![]()
looking forward to get the most out of anonx![]()
Reality is my setting ok?
what's ur setting that made ur bt fast?
this is what i have...![]()
![]()
James,
Cable Modem
I have a wireless D-Link Router/NAT at Home
ZoneAlarm -- Set to Medium with port 1723 and Portocal 47 Open
I download the free version of eDonkey2000 to my laptop and connected to many 13 of 20 servers while connected to AnonX
I used Kaza Lite/Shareaza to connect to eDonkey2000 servers with similar results while connecting to AnonX.
But there are still some eDonkey servers that I can connect to without AnonX, but cannot connect to with AnonX.
Still working on it.
I also did some packet ananlysis on my connection and saw that the UDP packets that are sent by eDonkey are quite large and the AnonX server that I am connecting to ignores some of them... This is a VPN limitation that can be changed. I will make the changes and test some more.
Good news about the spreading news of AnonX.
Thanks for all of your testing and preformance tuning.
Try connecting to the eDoneky server 195.245.244.243
I am getting HighID on eDonkey with Shareaza and Kazaa Lite, now
What are you getting?
Bookmarks