I agree that baseball is fun too play as is soccer for that matter.Originally posted by Busyman+5 April 2004 - 01:50--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Busyman @ 5 April 2004 - 01:50)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-hobbes@4 April 2004 - 19:10
The cool thing about baseball is connecting with the ball. Something very satisfying about crushing the ball, and knowing it from the sound it makes on your bat.
Basketball is great, but the excitement is only moderate as you can only score 3 point.
The long bomb, the break away in hockey are much more exciting than a turn-over dunk.
I remember Vince Coleman, Willie McGee, Ozzie Smith and Lonnie Smith on the St Louis Cardinals. You get 1 of these guys on base and the pitcher goes nuts. Vince Coleman was awesome, as was Whiteyball.
Watching it is another story.
I don't know what context to put that in that the excitement is moderate because of scoring 3 points. (btw you can score 2 points too)
The long bomb is very exciting but basketball has break aways also.
They are called fast breaks.![]()
The difference is that in basketball the players are more likely to execute a goal.
Hockey and soccer are more likely to end up in disappointment because of a missed goal. (this also applies to my home basketball team the Washington Wizards) THEY SUCK ASS!!![/b][/quote]
Busy,
I am trying to find out how to create the perfect sport.
Each goal should be significant, but not exclusive.
In Basketball a fastbreak score is irrelevant to the final score, even a loss is no big deal.
Football puts a lot of importance on each game since there are 16, not 84 or 162 games.
When you get the "long bomb" in football this may decide the game, not a dunk in basketball.
American football is the best for score/value ratio.
It sucks in action/do nothing ratio. Basketball is the best in this category.
Bookmarks