1 yes no question it's the right thing to do.
2 yes they will but it's not the right thing to do.
3 no they wouldn't because it's the wrong thing to do.
4 no they wouldn't because they are overstretched as it is.
5 no they won't but they should.
1 yes no question it's the right thing to do.
2 yes they will but it's not the right thing to do.
3 no they wouldn't because it's the wrong thing to do.
4 no they wouldn't because they are overstretched as it is.
5 no they won't but they should.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
How to make a poll:
https://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=85679
Number 4Originally Posted by vidcc
Iran is 4 times larger than Iraq and has a population of over 60 million. The terrain and climate are awful and they have far more military equipment than Iraq had by the time of the invasion. The US could not contain Iraq and meet other commitments without drafting - which I believe is off the cards, non?
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum
Easy one to start off with?
Option 4... But i bet he tries
i know you'll eat me for saying this but i hope they never get peace in iraq by america's plans. if they get a bloody nose it would be great for world peace because the whitehouse would know picking a fight with a competant enemy would be a stupod idea
option 4, god i wanna watch america get their asses wooped like they did in vietnam, just in the ME. if i'm not mistaken, the war on Iraq is still not over, no matter what the "administration" says.
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
that too, but held back from sounding h4r5hOriginally Posted by cpt_azad
I pick 2...and I do believe the draft will be reinstated..soon.
Last edited by ruthie; 11-22-2004 at 12:35 AM.
Why does this poll imply that the talks in Iran are unilateral? It’s not only the US talking with the Iranians to get them to stop their developments.
There should be an option to vote for invasion only if the Iranians refuse to cooperate and refuse to stop developments, and military action is a last resort.
then that would ( in your opinion) be 1Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Bookmarks