Innocent shooting

[Busyman]

I don't understand.

The sun makes him look lighter you mean? I have seen different pictures of him on the news and in the papers and he still looks the same colour as me

I see.

Looking at the left pf the picture (less sun), he is rather "light skinded".

Why'd they have ta kill dat white man?

[Rat Faced]

I dunno what the fuck to believe anymore, i want to see the CCTV footage...


1st.... he was in a Heavy Coat and jumping a barrier, running from us, warned and was directly connected to the attack.

then: Ooops, he wasnt connected at all, he was a Brazilian, but we arent gonna change our "shoot to kill" policy...

then: well, we've nearly shot 7 other people so far and followed another 250 because we thought they might be suicide bombers...

then: we dont have a "shoot to kill" policy now, we use Tasars..

then: Well, actually, he wasnt wearing a heavy coat or jumping a barrier either, and no there wasnt any warnings..... but he was an illegal immigrant, the visa stamps in his passport were forged..


I want to know wtf happened now, it seems every time the Met open their gobs, someone points out they're talking shit, so they change the story..

[Mïcrösöül°V³]

I watched that video of the gunship mowing down those people.....and it really didnt bother me at all. There was obviously a reason for it. Just my opinion.

[Barbarossa]

I watched that video of the gunship mowing down those people.....and it really didnt bother me at all. There was obviously a reason for it. Just my opinion.

eh?

[JPaul]

I watched that video of the gunship mowing down those people.....and it really didnt bother me at all. There was obviously a reason for it. Just my opinion.

eh?

Seconded.

[MCHeshPants420]

eh?

Seconded.

Feck, they really have beefed up security if they are using gunships.

[DanB]

Seconded.

Feck, they really have beefed up security if they are using gunships.

F'king fare dodgers

[peat moss]

I don't understand.

The sun makes him look lighter you mean? I have seen different pictures of him on the news and in the papers and he still looks the same colour as me

Sorry had n't seen a picture of the poor bastard till now. My apologies but the newspaper story I read sure gave me that impression .

[Rat Faced]

Well, now that more details have come out, it appears that the Met were lying through their teeth...

Remember the original story?

He was a strong suspect, wearing a heavy bulky coat, running from the police, jumping the barrier and had wires hanging from his pack..

The 1st thing that came out was he was innocent...



Now it's been confirmed he was wearing a light denim jacket, over a tee-shirt... perfectly normal clothing for the weather.

He left his flat and the police that were watching the block DID NOT confirm his identity, they stated they couldnt and someone else would need to check him out.

He walked slowly to catch his bus and the policemen following DID NOT confirm his identity, mentioning only that he had "Mongolian Eyes".

He got off the bus, walked to the Tube station and picked up one of the free papers then used his Oyster Card to go through the barriers and walked towards the platform.

A train was on the way into the station so we quickened his step in order to catch it... note, he DIDNT RUN, he started walking a little quicker to catch his train.

Once on the train, one of the police grabbed and held him by the arms, whilst another shot him 7 times in the head from 12 inches away... note the distance, and the copper MISSED 3 times, in addition to the 7 times he was shot.


The Police were all plainsclothesmen, and according to witnesses did at no time identitfy themselves or give any warnings.

Note also, that the police were all in possesion of photographs of the 2 suspects in the block of flats... and they looked nowt like the guy shot, except dark hair and dark eyes..


Still trust your "shoot to kill" policy by these people?

Like i said before, i dont trust half our squaddies with guns.. never mind the coppers.

[manker]

If that is exactly how it happened, then I think that the police have broken the law.

I don't trust the shoot to kill policy and didn't earlier in the thread, however, I think that there must be more to it than what is written above.

Even in the heightened state of security that must have been prevalent on the tube, to kill someone simply because he had dark eyes, dark hair and lived approximate to an address found in a rucksack of one of the failed bombers is completely ludicrous.