
Originally Posted by
JPaul
Which particular tactics would you describe as being "Israeli tactics", as opposed to any other type of tactics.
Oh and whilst we are on it, who are you talking about when you say "I am amazed at how many of those who have spoken out against Israeli tactics seem so willing to accept them when their own country is exposed to the same sort of threats"
I am genuinely intrigued, as I have not noted the same phenomenon. Who are these dissenters of which you speak.
The anti-suicide bomber tactics which teams were sent to Israel to learn. If you wish to dispute that I suggest you take it up with John Stevens, former Met Police Commissioner, since he is the one who claims he sent the teams.
As to those who now appear willing to accept these tactics, I suggest you read some of the threads regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict. I'm not going to trawl through them. If you can't work out for yourself those who have spoken out against them in the past then you are unlikely to take my word for it so there's little point.

Originally Posted by
Busyman

Originally Posted by
lynx
I am amazed at how many of those who have spoken out against Israeli tactics seem so willing to accept them when their own country is exposed to the same sort of threats.
Another flawed comparison.
They are two entirely different situations.
Different in what way? Are you now suggesting that it is ok for British police to gun people down in the street, but not ok for Israelis to do the same against Palestinians?
Your logic escapes me.
Bookmarks