from Six66Mike:
". . .let the cops decide", Eloquent simplicity. If interested in a drawn out version, read below.
1) You are wrong if you believe that authorities do not take ANY allegation of this sort VERY seriously. There are literally thousands of examples in divorce cases, etc. Where scant evidence and allegations have had as their end, serious investigations. Often times the person is not guilty, ask Pete Townsend
2) Imperfect justice? Of course, there is imperfect justice. A blind platitude, Perry. The fact is that because a society cannot prevent every drunk from driving a vehicle without significant infringements on the innocents liberty does not tell LE to stop all attempts at preventing them. Take simple but honest infringements on liberty, to wit, a random roadblock. Is this fair to innocent folk? Is it an infringements of personal privacy? Some argue it is. . . Random drug testing for jobs? Cameras taking pictures and then you are mailed a speeding ticket? Drug laws are legion and many catch up the innocent with the guilty. Are they infringements?
You type: "There IS technology that could monitor our every action online AND in the real world. We could have traffic cams at every intersection. Radar equipped cameras could record our roadways for speeders and drunk drivers. We could virtually eliminate street crime by posting video cameras in all public places. Our ISPs could turn over records to be scanned for our every page view and our emails could be previewed for suspicious activity. Since drug use leads to the deaths of innocents each year, we could ALL be required to send in MANDATORY blood and urine samples each month/week. All of our phone conversations could be screened as well"
I reply:
cf. above. I am, of course, ignoring MANY examples. Let's think through your example: Without the folks being unduly infringed upon there is no perfect justice, another (or the same) platitude. (There is no need here for me to drag up all of the rights and liberties US citizen have given up in the "drug war") The real issue in this case is about a guy posting his vile links to his 'buddies'. Nothing more and nothing less. NO REQUIREMENTS OF LOST LIBERTY ON INNOCENT CITIZENS.
2) If you think that if one of the parties copied the information as posted here and took it to the authorities and they would ignore it, cf. #1, so be it. BUT WHAT HAS THIS TO DO YOU WITH YOU? YOU HAVE A DUTY TO THE INNOCENTS OFFENDED AND IF YOU DO THAT DUTY AND IT FALLS STILLBORN THEN, SADLY, SO BE IT, ALSO.
3) As for the original poster, I suspect his motives are anything but sincere. But mine are quite sincere and not grandstanding. I simply find this behavior utterly vile. There are certain things that rank highest on my hierarchy of the degeneracy of crimes: The abuse of innocents tops the list.
Ultimately, what I saw convinced me that it was a site that I no longer wanted to be a member of. I see a small group of staff and a degenerate scumbag who was at some point a founder of the site involved in the reported conversation. Is this somehow completely oblique to the main site? Not for me. My life, my call.
This is my last post in this thread. I am allowing myself to get too upset. (I remember years ago I had a 'powerlifting' forum- the older threaded type forum- and we got overwrought in these internet debates. I lost sleep; I was angry, lol. But we knew real names and eventually met in person at meets and worked things out. Nevertheless, it's not worth it for me, now.)
Addenda as a final reply to below:
Thanks. (I have two sets of twins- 10 & 12.)
I guess we just disagree as to what LE considers large crimes. Alleged Federal infractions such as this, or other crimes they spend time on, say public intoxication. I suggest asking an officer if you happen to know any.
Screen shot -> links -> witness. If it doesn't provide enough for a search warrant it will put the light of day on him. The whole point is and has been that it was their duty to report it.
Inappropriate pics? That is a problematic and silly way to refer to what was evidently linked.
Bookmarks