OH FUCK
I can't bring myself to quote it :pinch:
let's nevar talk about this again.
Printable View
OH FUCK
I can't bring myself to quote it :pinch:
let's nevar talk about this again.
<--Confused, I was pretty sure that box was universal. Whichever hole gets penetrated most often, is it not?Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
Um, a lady's box is something quite different in Britain. Why can't you people in Crazyland get them the right way round?Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
You bought her a gangbang for her birthday. :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by megabyteme
I don't think there are enough black males within a reasonable drivable distance of his region of residence. Also, I think they're into TOYS. The black piping is probably related.Quote:
Originally Posted by Something ElseYou bought her a gangbang for her birthday. :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by megabyteme
It's for her gate, not her gait. :noes:
Of coarse. I shall only bring it up when I'm on my period. I think that's fare.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
No, it's a cunt.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
AKA Life?Quote:
Originally Posted by SqueamousOf coarse. I shall only bring it up when I'm on my period. I think that's fare.
No, it's a cunt.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
Why isn't that compatible with cunt? Cunt is the originally intended meaning of my use of box, which makes your original reply all the more confusing. I thought you were going to try to convince me it meant rectumhole or something, hence my cautiously worded definition.Quote:
Originally Posted by SqueamousNo, it's a cunt.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
In summation, I was originally painting a picture of loose drooping labia and perhaps some swollen heavily used vaginal tissue hanging out while you're being spanked. It was a notion of lacking tautness that I just carried on the back of an intentional misspelling by manker (assumed).
Have you ever actually been intimate with the contents of a lady's gusset....I mean, one under pensionable age :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyWhy isn't that compatible with cunt? Cunt is the originally intended meaning of my use of box, which makes your original reply all the more confusing. I thought you were going to try to convince me it meant rectumhole or something, hence my cautiously worded definition.Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
In summation, I was originally painting a picture of loose drooping labia and perhaps some swollen heavily used vaginal tissue hanging out while you're being spanked. It was a notion of lacking tautness that I just carried on the back of an intentional misspelling by manker (assumed).
If you know how to get a five year old to squirt, I'm all ears.Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
I'm not entirely sure he's familiar with lady gardens of any vintage.Quote:
Originally Posted by SqueamousHave you ever actually been intimate with the contents of a lady's gusset....I mean, one under pensionable age :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
One hates to be presumptuous but he was on about getting a ticket for cruising in San Francisco in a thread earlier today.
Draw your own conclusions :kiss:
:glagpinch:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyIf you know how to get a five year old to squirt, I'm all ears.Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
pedobear strikes again.
:ermm:Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisthere you are manker, I quoted it for posterity. you can thank me laterQuote:
Originally Posted by SqueamousUm, a lady's box is something quite different in Britain. Why can't you people in Crazyland get them the right way round?Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
You're either very skilled in the art of misdirection - and if that is the case, then I am hugely in your debt, sir.
Or you're reading this thread though a fog of opium and mental illness.
I can't quite picture in my mind what the Mack's perfect partner would look like, but I'm convinced it wouldn't be male OR female. Back to the drawing board.Quote:
Originally Posted by mankerI'm not entirely sure he's familiar with lady gardens of any vintage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
One hates to be presumptuous but he was on about getting a ticket for cruising in San Francisco in a thread earlier today.
Draw your own conclusions :kiss:
I can totally see him anthropomorphising his favourite lanthanide and getting married in some kind of mentalist civil ceremony in Arkansas.Quote:
Originally Posted by SqueamousI can't quite picture in my mind what the Mack's perfect partner would look like, but I'm convinced it wouldn't be male OR female. Back to the drawing board.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
I'd like to take a bow for the art of misdirection, but teh board seemed to have an attack of the bad aids for me, I refreshed the fred saw a comment of yours (the shocked mortified one where you never wanted to mention dangling ladybits evar again) and replied. I then found out a whole page of fun and games precipitated my reply, making my reply utterly fucking redundant and leaving you with the impression that I have had too much drugs today....which I have by the way and thanks for asking. :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker:ermm:Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemisthere you are manker, I quoted it for posterity. you can thank me laterQuote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
You're either very skilled in the art of misdirection - and if that is the case, then I am hugely in your debt, sir.
Or you're reading this thread though a fog of opium and mental illness.
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
So it seems.
The misdirection would still work, you're doing an exceptional job. Except I feel I need to clear things up.
Dangling lady-bits are meat and drink - I was referring to my grammatical fuck-up :pinch:
To which I will carry on with the magical misdirection and blame it on the drugs...... I had mushrooms for breakfast.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Actually I was just watching the music video for Placebo's Meds and this fred popped into my head, thanks manker for disturbing my qwality time.....
I'm both flattered and unsettled that you thought of me while cracking one out.
Ah yes, that I've just stepped on a rake in the tall grass feeling, I know it well....Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
There are however other things to do in life to relax than rub one out, so although you can feel flattered, you shouldn't feel flattered in THAT way.
Fair cop though...... :glag:
I can see it now; his eyes locked with Lanthanum across a crowded lab. He had been unhappy in his relationship with Cereum for quite some time, and now with his electric bolt of 'chemistry' (pinky in corner of mouth smiley) he realises there is no other for him. He must have her. He must find out her name....she WILL be his.....Quote:
Originally Posted by mankerI can totally see him anthropomorphising his favourite lanthanide and getting married in some kind of mentalist civil ceremony in Arkansas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
You were almost there, you just needed to finish the thought. How about a little Mexican girl who constantly wanders around and nobody would notice is missing?Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
Attachment 93671
Clearly benzene since I prefer them flat.Quote:
Originally Posted by SqueamousI can see it now; his eyes locked with Lanthanum across a crowded lab. He had been unhappy in his relationship with Cereum for quite some time, and now with his electric bolt of 'chemistry' (pinky in corner of mouth smiley) he realises there is no other for him. He must have her. He must find out her name....she WILL be his.....Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Note to self: It's not bad parenting if they are "exploring". :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
Exploring my genital regionQuote:
Originally Posted by megabyteme
My wife says she's especially creeped out by that comment since, "Her daughter has that same pic on her jammies"...Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
I'm watching you, Macky. :ermm:
It'll only be creepy if I ask what part of her body the picture covers. Tell her not to worry, as she's safe for another 8 years at least. I could at least be in jail or dead by then, so it's not totally hopeless. Your son, though, I'll come for earlier. I don't have any appropriate pictures to append to the ominous suggestion.Quote:
Originally Posted by megabytemeMy wife says she's especially creeped out by that comment since, "Her daughter has that same pic on her jammies"...Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
I'm watching you, Macky. :ermm:
:d
I am sure there is an award for the most inept and unerotic depiction of encounters of a sexual kind. A "Floppy" or something else. Although only two lines that has to be a contender.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyQuote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
In summation, I was originally painting a picture of loose drooping labia and perhaps some swollen heavily used vaginal tissue hanging out while you're being spanked. It was a notion of lacking tautness that I just carried on the back of an intentional misspelling by manker (assumed).
:lol: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyClearly benzene since I prefer them flat.Quote:
Originally Posted by SqueamousI can see it now; his eyes locked with Lanthanum across a crowded lab. He had been unhappy in his relationship with Cereum for quite some time, and now with his electric bolt of 'chemistry' (pinky in corner of mouth smiley) he realises there is no other for him. He must have her. He must find out her name....she WILL be his.....Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quite clearly this triumvirate of posts is the starkest example of geek humour to be found anywhere on the internets.
Fantastic.
I'm just glad I'm not the only one that's been checking out her bond angles.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Hybridization baby? You know daddy's got jungle fever.
oh noes.
You've lost me now. It was just that last line.
I think I speak for everyone, however, when I say that there is absolutely no need to elaborate.
The teacher in me won't accept that. Starting tomorrow, I'll begin a 3-part lecture series explaining the joke, here is the outline:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Day 1. We will discuss the nature of electrons and their role in non ionic bonding.
Day 2. We will discuss bonding orbitals and how it relates to bond strength, compound stability and geometry.
Day 3. We will discuss bond orbital hybridization, and why they're dirty sexy acts of lower class citizens.
You could probably condense days one and two into an hour since I bring with me a basic grasp on stuff.
Day three, however, is going to be new and I would ask you to defer it until Tuesday week, I need to make sure I'm completely alone.
I'm sure you understand :lookaroun
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
....hmmm. The English asked me to ask you if you know anything about a little girl we lost in Spain while her parents were pissed up on Sangria. Goes by the name of 'Maddy'.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyYou were almost there, you just needed to finish the thought. How about a little Mexican girl who constantly wanders around and nobody would notice is missing?Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
Attachment 93671
Benzene's ok, if you like that sort of thing. I like my carbon a little rounder in figureQuote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyI'm just glad I'm not the only one that's been checking out her bond angles.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Hybridization baby? You know daddy's got jungle fever.
Attachment 93869